journal article·1996-04

A new curvature‐driven delamination test for measuring the mode II toughness of composites

D. S. Matsumoto, M. A. Vallance, S. K. Gifford

Polymer Composites· Volume 17· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The measurement of the delamination toughness of composites requires fracture tests with well‐characterized geometries. Because the delamination toughness is frequently used as a material selection parameter, it is necessary to differentiate between experimental artifacts, data scatter, and changes in the mechanism of delamination. This new Curvature‐Driven Delamination (CDD) test for Mode II provides a direct, steady‐state measurement of the pure Mode II delamination toughness without the compliance calculations inherent in other delamination test protocols. Like the Wedge‐Driven Delamination (WDD) test for Mode I, the CDD Mode II test measures the toughness at controlled crack growth rates. The CDD Mode II test correlates well with the results of the established End‐Notch Flexure (ENF) Mode II test but is not subject to the geometric instabilities of that test. Changes in the delamination mechanism are easily observed by the direct, continuous measurement of the toughness in the CDD Mode II test.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0073070110.1007/BF00730701 ↗
2. 10.1177/07316844820010040210.1177/073168448200100402 ↗
3. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90058-310.1016/0266-3538(87)90058-3 ↗
4. A. J.RussellandK. N.Street “Moisture and Temperature Effects on the Mixed Mode Delamination Fracture of Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy ” DREP Tech. Memo 83–22 Defense Research Establishment Pacific Victoria B.C. Canada (1983).
5. A. J.RussellandK. N.Street inDelamination and Debonding of Materials W. S.Johnson ed. ASTM STP 876 349 Philadelphia(1985).
6. 10.1016/0266-3538(86)90031-X10.1016/0266-3538(86)90031-X ↗
7. Gillespie J. W. · 1990
8. A. L.Glessner M. T.Takemori M. A.Vallance andS. K.Gifford inComposite Materials: Fracture and Fatigue 2ndVol. PaulLagace ed. ASTM 1012 181 Philadelphia(1989).10.1520/STP10416S ↗
9. 10.1520/CTR10081J10.1520/CTR10081J ↗
10. T. K.O'Brien G. B.Murri andS. A.Salpekar inComposite Materials: Fracture and Fatigue 2ndVol. PaulLagace ed. ASTM 1012 181 Philadelphia(1989).
11. 10.1177/07316844860050030210.1177/073168448600500302 ↗
12. M. A.Vallance private communication.
13. D. S.Matsumoto M. A.Vallance B. J.McKinley andM. L.Todt in “The Effect of Fabric Structure on the Mode I and Mode II Toughnesses of Polymeric Composites” (to be published).
14. Williams J. G. · 1980