DataVXCellulosePaper
journal article·2022-11Open access

Hydrophobization of lignocellulosic materials part II: chemical modification

Sandra Rodríguez-Fabià, Jonathan Torstensen, Lars Johansson, Kristin Syverud

Cellulose· Volume 29· Issue 17
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

Abstract Lignocellulosic materials with hydrophobic properties are of great interest for developing sustainable products that can be used in various applications such as packaging, water-repellent and self-cleaning materials, oil and water separation or as reinforcements in biocomposite materials. The hydroxyl functional groups present in cellulose provide the possibility to perform various chemical modifications to the cellulosic substrates that can increase their hydrophobicity. This review is the second part of a comprehensive review on hydrophobization of lignocellulosic materials and summarizes the recent advances in the chemical modification of such substrates. The methods described in this review can provide changes in the hydrophilicity of the materials that range from a small decrease in the initial hydrophilicity of the substrate (contact angles below 90°) to superhydrophobic properties (contact angles above 150°). Additional attention has been paid to whether the modification is limited to the surface of the substrate or if it occurs in the bulk of the material. We also discuss hydrophobized cellulose material applications in packing and oil/water purification. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

Composites

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Aalbers GJW, Boott CE, D’Acierno F, Lewis L, Ho J, Michal CA, Hamad WY, MacLachlan MJ (2019) Post-modification of cellulose nanocrystal aerogels with thiol-ene click chemistry. Biomacromolecules 20(7):2779–2785. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0053310.1021/acs.biomac.9b00533 ↗
2. Abraham E, Kam D, Nevo Y, Slattegard R, Rivkin A, Lapidot S, Shoseyov O (2016) Highly modified cellulose nanocrystals and formation of epoxy-nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC) nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(41):28086–28095. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0985210.1021/acsami.6b09852 ↗
3. Adenekan K, Hutton-Prager B (2019) Sticky hydrophobic behavior of cellulose substrates impregnated with alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) via sub- and supercritical carbon dioxide. Colloids Surf A 560:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.07310.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.073 ↗
4. Anastas PT, Warner JC (1998) Green chemistry: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New York
5. Andresen M, Stenius P (2007) Water-in-oil emulsions stabilized by hydrophobized microfibrillated cellulose. J Dispers Sci Technol 28(6):837–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/0193269070134182710.1080/01932690701341827 ↗
6. Andresen M, Johansson L-S, Tanem BS, Stenius P (2006) Properties and characterization of hydrophobized microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 13(6):665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9072-110.1007/s10570-006-9072-1 ↗
7. Andresen M, Stenstad P, Møretrø T, Langsrud S, Syverud K, Johansson L-S, Stenius P (2007) Nonleaching antimicrobial films prepared from surface-modified microfibrillated cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8(7):2149–2155. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm070304e10.1021/bm070304e ↗
8. Arancibia F, Izquierdo E, Pereira M (2021) Stabilization of the emulsion of Alkenyl Succinic Anhydride (ASA) in water using cellulose nanofibrils. Chem Eng Sci 233:116407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.11640710.1016/j.ces.2020.116407 ↗
9. Ashish K, Bhardwaj NK, Singh SP (2019) Cationic starch and polyacrylamides for alkenyl succinic anhydride (ASA) emulsification for sizing of cellulosic fibers. Cellulose 26(18):9901–9915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02758-610.1007/s10570-019-02758-6 ↗
10. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17(3):559–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y ↗
11. Ávila Ramírez JA, Gómez Hoyos C, Arroyo S, Cerrutti P, Foresti ML (2016) Acetylation of bacterial cellulose catalyzed by citric acid: use of reaction conditions for tailoring the esterification extent. Carbohydr Polym 153:686–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.00910.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.009 ↗
12. Ávila Ramírez JA, Fortunati E, Kenny JM, Torre L, Foresti ML (2017) Simple citric acid-catalyzed surface esterification of cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 157:1358–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.008 ↗
13. Bae JH, Kim SH (2015) Alkylation of mixed micro- and nanocellulose to improve dispersion in polylactide. Polym Int 64(6):821–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.485810.1002/pi.4858 ↗
14. Barbosa RFS, Souza AG, Ferreira FF, Rosa DS (2019) Isolation and acetylation of cellulose nanostructures with a homogeneous system. Carbohydr Polym 218:208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.07210.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.072 ↗
15. Bardet R, Reverdy C, Belgacem N, Leirset I, Syverud K, Bardet M, Bras J (2015) Substitution of nanoclay in high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibrils with cellulose nanocrystals and thermal treatment. Cellulose 22(2):1227–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0547-910.1007/s10570-015-0547-9 ↗
16. Beaumont M, Bacher M, Opietnik M, Gindl-Altmutter W, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2018) A general aqueous silanization protocol to introduce vinyl, mercapto or azido functionalities onto cellulose fibers and nanocelluloses. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2306142710.3390/molecules23061427 ↗
17. Beaumont M, Winklehner S, Veigel S, Mundigler N, Gindl-Altmutter W, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2020) Wet esterification of never-dried cellulose: a simple process to surface-acetylated cellulose nanofibers. Green Chem 22(17):5605–5609. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC02116D10.1039/D0GC02116D ↗
18. Beaumont M, Jusner P, Gierlinger N, King AWT, Potthast A, Rojas OJ, Rosenau T (2021a) Unique reactivity of nanoporous cellulosic materials mediated by surface-confined water. Nat Commun 12(1):2513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22682-310.1038/s41467-021-22682-3 ↗
19. Beaumont M, Otoni CG, Mattos BD, Koso TV, Abidnejad R, Zhao B, Kondor A, King AWT, Rojas OJ (2021b) Regioselective and water-assisted surface esterification of never-dried cellulose: nanofibers with adjustable surface energy. Green Chem 23(18):6966–6974. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC02292J10.1039/D1GC02292J ↗
20. Beaumont M, Tardy BL, Reyes G, Koso TV, Schaubmayr E, Jusner P, King AWT, Dagastine RR, Potthast A, Rojas OJ, Rosenau T (2021c) Assembling native elementary cellulose nanofibrils via a reversible and regioselective surface functionalization. J Am Chem Soc 143(41):17040–17046. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c0650210.1021/jacs.1c06502 ↗
21. Bendahou A, Hajlane A, Dufresne A, Boufi S, Kaddami H (2015) Esterification and amidation for grafting long aliphatic chains on to cellulose nanocrystals: a comparative study. Res Chem Intermed 41(7):4293–4310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-014-1530-z10.1007/s11164-014-1530-z ↗
22. Bernards DA, Desai TA (2010) Nanoscale porosity in polymer films: fabrication and therapeutic applications. Soft Matter 6(8):1621–1631. https://doi.org/10.1039/B922303G10.1039/B922303G ↗
23. Botaro VR, Gandini A (1998) Chemical modification of the surface of cellulosic fibres. 2. Introduction of alkenyl moieties via condensation reactions involving isocyanate functions. Cellulose 5(2):65–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100921672968610.1023/A:1009216729686 ↗
24. Castellano M, Gandini A, Fabbri P, Belgacem MN (2004) Modification of cellulose fibres with organosilanes: under what conditions does coupling occur? J Colloid Interface Sci 273(2):505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2003.09.04410.1016/j.jcis.2003.09.044 ↗
25. Çetin NS, Tingaut P, Özmen N, Henry N, Harper D, Dadmun M, Sèbe G (2009) Acetylation of cellulose nanowhiskers with vinyl acetate under moderate conditions. Macromol Biosci 9(10):997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20090007310.1002/mabi.200900073 ↗
26. Chadlia A, Farouk MHM (2011) Rapid homogeneous esterification of cellulose extracted from Posidonia induced by microwave irradiation. J Appl Polym Sci 119(6):3372–3381. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3297310.1002/app.32973 ↗
27. Cheng H, Gu B, Pennefather MP, Nguyen TX, Phan-Thien N, Duong HM (2017) Cotton aerogels and cotton-cellulose aerogels from environmental waste for oil spillage cleanup. Mater Des 130:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.08210.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.082 ↗
28. Chinga-Carrasco G, Kuznetsova N, Garaeva M, Leirset I, Galiullina G, Kostochko A, Syverud K (2012) Bleached and unbleached MFC nanobarriers: properties and hydrophobisation with hexamethyldisilazane. J Nanopart Res 14(12):1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1280-z10.1007/s11051-012-1280-z ↗
29. Cunha AG, Gandini A (2010) Turning polysaccharides into hydrophobic materials: a critical review. Part 1. Cellulose. Cellulose 17(5):875–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9434-610.1007/s10570-010-9434-6 ↗
30. Cunha AG, Freire C, Silvestre A, Neto CP, Gandini A, Belgacem MN, Chaussy D, Beneventi D (2010) Preparation of highly hydrophobic and lipophobic cellulose fibers by a straightforward gas–solid reaction. J Colloid Interface Sci 344(2):588–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.05710.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.057 ↗
31. David G, Gontard N, Guerin D, Heux L, Lecomte J, Molina-Boisseau S, Angellier-Coussy H (2019) Exploring the potential of gas-phase esterification to hydrophobize the surface of micrometric cellulose particles. Eur Polym J 115:138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.03.00210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.03.002 ↗
32. De Geyter N, Morent R, Leys C (2008) Surface characterization of plasma-modified polyethylene by contact angle experiments and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Surf Interface Anal 40(3–4):608–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.261110.1002/sia.2611 ↗
33. de Menezes AJ, Pasquini D, Curvelo AADS, Gandini A (2009) Self-reinforced composites obtained by the partial oxypropylation of cellulose fibers. 1. Characterization of the materials obtained with different types of fibers. Carbohydr Polym 76(3):437–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.00610.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.006 ↗
34. Ding Q, Zeng J, Wang B, Tang D, Chen K, Gao W (2019) Effect of nanocellulose fiber hornification on water fraction characteristics and hydroxyl accessibility during dehydration. Carbohydr Polym 207:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.07510.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.075 ↗
35. Downey WF (1953) Higher alkyl ketene dimer emulsion, Google Patents
36. Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: from nature to high performance tailored materials. De Gruyter, Berlin
37. Ebringerová A (2005) Structural diversity and application potential of hemicelluloses. Macromol Symp 232(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20055140110.1002/masy.200551401 ↗
38. Edgar K (2004) Cellulose esters, organic. In: Mark HF (ed) Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 129–158
39. Elyashevich GK, Olifirenko AS, Pimenov AV (2005) Micro- and nanofiltration membranes on the base of porous polyethylene films. Desalination 184(1):273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.05510.1016/j.desal.2005.03.055 ↗
40. Eyley S, Thielemans W (2014) Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals. Nanoscale 6(14):7764–7779. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR01756K10.1039/C4NR01756K ↗
41. Fadeev AY, McCarthy TJ (2000) Self-Assembly is not the only reaction possible between alkyltrichlorosilanes and surfaces: monomolecular and oligomeric covalently attached layers of dichloro- and trichloroalkylsilanes on silicon. Langmuir 16(18):7268–7274. https://doi.org/10.1021/la000471z10.1021/la000471z ↗
42. Fairbanks BD, Love DM, Bowman CN (2017) Efficient polymer–polymer conjugation via thiol-ene click reaction. Macromol Chem Phys 218(18):1700073. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.20170007310.1002/macp.201700073 ↗
43. Fang JM, Sun RC, Tomkinson J, Fowler P (2000) Acetylation of wheat straw hemicellulose B in a new non-aqueous swelling system. Carbohydr Polym 41(4):379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(99)00102-210.1016/S0144-8617(99)00102-2 ↗
44. Farooq M, Zou T, Riviere G, Sipponen MH, Österberg M (2019) Strong, ductile, and waterproof cellulose nanofibril composite films with colloidal lignin particles. Biomacromolecules 20(2):693–704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0136410.1021/acs.biomac.8b01364 ↗
45. Fatona A, Berry RM, Brook MA, Moran-Mirabal JM (2018) Versatile surface modification of cellulose fibers and cellulose nanocrystals through modular triazinyl chemistry. Chem Mater 30(7):2424–2435. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0051110.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00511 ↗
46. Feng J, Nguyen ST, Fan Z, Duong HM (2015) Advanced fabrication and oil absorption properties of super-hydrophobic recycled cellulose aerogels. Chem Eng J 270:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.03410.1016/j.cej.2015.02.034 ↗
47. Filpponen I, Kontturi E, Nummelin S, Rosilo H, Kolehmainen E, Ikkala O, Laine J (2012) Generic method for modular surface modification of cellulosic materials in aqueous medium by sequential “click” reaction and adsorption. Biomacromolecules 13(3):736–742. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm201661k10.1021/bm201661k ↗
48. Fox SC, Li B, Xu D, Edgar KJ (2011) Regioselective esterification and etherification of cellulose: a review. Biomacromolecules 12(6):1956–1972. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200260d10.1021/bm200260d ↗
49. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwamoto S, Kumamoto Y, Ohdaira T, Suzuki R, Isogai A (2011) Pore size determination of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril films by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 12(11):4057–4062. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm201079n10.1021/bm201079n ↗
50. Fumagalli M, Ouhab D, Boisseau SM, Heux L (2013a) Versatile gas-phase reactions for surface to bulk esterification of cellulose microfibrils aerogels. Biomacromolecules 14(9):3246–3255. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400864z10.1021/bm400864z ↗
51. Fumagalli M, Sanchez F, Boisseau SM, Heux L (2013b) Gas-phase esterification of cellulose nanocrystal aerogels for colloidal dispersion in apolar solvents. Soft Matter 9(47):11309–11317. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SM52062E10.1039/C3SM52062E ↗
52. Fumagalli M, Sanchez F, Molina-Boisseau S, Heux L (2015) Surface-restricted modification of nanocellulose aerogels in gas-phase esterification by di-functional fatty acid reagents. Cellulose 22(3):1451–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0585-310.1007/s10570-015-0585-3 ↗
53. Garnier G, Wright J, Godbout L, Yu L (1998) Wetting mechanism of alkyl ketene dimers on cellulose films. Colloids Surf A 145(1):153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00668-210.1016/S0927-7757(98)00668-2 ↗
54. Geissler A, Chen L, Zhang K, Bonaccurso E, Biesalski M (2013) Superhydrophobic surfaces fabricated from nano- and microstructured cellulose stearoyl esters. Chem Commun 49(43):4962–4964. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC41568F10.1039/C3CC41568F ↗
55. Gómez FN, Combariza MY, Blanco-Tirado C (2017) Facile cellulose nanofibrils amidation using a ‘one-pot’ approach. Cellulose 24(2):717–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1174-910.1007/s10570-016-1174-9 ↗
56. Goussé C, Chanzy H, Cerrada ML, Fleury E (2004) Surface silylation of cellulose microfibrils: preparation and rheological properties. Polymer 45(5):1569–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.02810.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.028 ↗
57. Gozutok Z, Kinj O, Torun I, Ozdemir AT, Onses MS (2019) One-step deposition of hydrophobic coatings on paper for printed-electronics applications. Cellulose 26(5):3503–3512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02326-y10.1007/s10570-019-02326-y ↗
58. Guo J, Catchmark JM (2012) Surface area and porosity of acid hydrolyzed cellulose nanowhiskers and cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 87(2):1026–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.06010.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.060 ↗
59. Guo C, Xiang M, Dong Y (2015) Surface modification of poly (lactic acid) with an improved alkali-acid hydrolysis method. Mater Lett 140:144–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.09910.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.099 ↗
60. Guo J, Du W, Gao Y, Cao Y, Yin Y (2017) Cellulose nanocrystals as water-in-oil pickering emulsifiers via intercalative modification. Colloids Surf A 529:634–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.06.05610.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.06.056 ↗
61. Habibi Y (2014) Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev 43(5):1519–1542. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60204D10.1039/C3CS60204D ↗
62. Habibi Y, Dufresne A (2008) Highly filled bionanocomposites from functionalized polysaccharide nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 9(7):1974–1980. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800171710.1021/bm8001717 ↗
63. Heinze T, El Seoud OA, Koschella A (2018) Etherification of cellulose. In: Heinze T, El Seoud OA, Koschella A (eds) Cellulose derivatives: synthesis, structure, and properties. Springer, Cham, pp 429–477
64. Hettegger H, Sumerskii I, Sortino S, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2015) Silane meets click chemistry: towards the functionalization of wet bacterial cellulose Sheets. ChemSusChem 8(4):680–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20140299110.1002/cssc.201402991 ↗
65. Hettegger H, Beaumont M, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2016) Aqueous modification of nano- and microfibrillar cellulose with a click synthon. Chemsuschem 9(1):75–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20150135810.1002/cssc.201501358 ↗
66. Hoyle CE, Bowman CN (2010) Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 49(9):1540–1573. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20090392410.1002/anie.200903924 ↗
67. Hu Z, Berry RM, Pelton R, Cranston ED (2017) One-pot water-based hydrophobic surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals using plant polyphenols. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(6):5018–5026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0041510.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00415 ↗
68. Huang P, Wu M, Kuga S, Wang D, Wu D, Huang Y (2012) One-step dispersion of cellulose nanofibers by mechanochemical esterification in an organic solvent. Chemsuschem 5(12):2319–2322. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20120049210.1002/cssc.201200492 ↗
69. Huang T, Chen C, Li D, Ek M (2019) Hydrophobic and antibacterial textile fibres prepared by covalently attaching betulin to cellulose. Cellulose 26(1):665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02265-810.1007/s10570-019-02265-8 ↗
70. Jandura P, Kokta BV, Riedl B (2000) Fibrous long-chain organic acid cellulose esters and their characterization by diffuse reflectance FTIR spectroscopy, solid-state CP/MAS 13C-NMR, and X-ray diffraction. J Appl Polym Sci 78(7):1354–1365. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20001114)78:7%3c1354::Aid-app60%3e3.0.Co;2-v10.1002/1097-4628(20001114)78:7<1354::Aid-app60>3.0.Co;2-v ↗
71. Jantas R, Górna K (2006) Antibacterial finishing of cotton fabrics. Fibres Text East Eur 14(1):88
72. Jarrah K, Hisaindee S, Al-Sayah MH (2018) Preparation of oil sorbents by solvent-free grafting of cellulose cotton fibers. Cellulose 25(7):4093–4106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1846-810.1007/s10570-018-1846-8 ↗
73. Jin H, Kettunen M, Laiho A, Pynnönen H, Paltakari J, Marmur A, Ikkala O, Ras RHA (2011) Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic nanocellulose aerogel membranes as bioinspired cargo carriers on water and oil. Langmuir 27(5):1930–1934. https://doi.org/10.1021/la103877r10.1021/la103877r ↗
74. Jin C, Jiang Y, Niu T, Huang J (2012) Cellulose-based material with amphiphobicity to inhibit bacterial adhesion by surface modification. J Mater Chem 22(25):12562–12567. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM31750H10.1039/C2JM31750H ↗
75. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Mathew AP, Hussein MZB, Oksman K (2010) Preparation of cellulose nanofibers with hydrophobic surface characteristics. Cellulose 17(2):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9387-910.1007/s10570-009-9387-9 ↗
76. Kargarzadeh H, Mariano M, Gopakumar D, Ahmad I, Thomas S, Dufresne A, Huang J, Lin N (2018) Advances in cellulose nanomaterials. Cellulose 25(4):2151–2189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1723-510.1007/s10570-018-1723-5 ↗
77. Kono H, Uno T, Tsujisaki H, Anai H, Kishimoto R, Matsushima T, Tajima K (2020) Nanofibrillated bacterial cellulose surface modified with methyltrimethoxysilane for fiber-reinforced composites. ACS Appl Nano Mater 3(8):8232–8241. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c0167010.1021/acsanm.0c01670 ↗
78. Krouit M, Bras J, Belgacem MN (2008) Cellulose surface grafting with polycaprolactone by heterogeneous click-chemistry. Eur Polym J 44(12):4074–4081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.09.01610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.09.016 ↗
79. Lackinger E, Hettegger H, Schwaiger L, Zweckmair T, Sartori J, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2016) Novel paper sizing agents based on renewables. Part 8: on the binding behavior of reactive sizing agents—the question of covalent versus adsorptive binding. Cellulose 23(1):823–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0794-910.1007/s10570-015-0794-9 ↗
80. Laitinen O, Suopajärvi T, Österberg M, Liimatainen H (2017) Hydrophobic, superabsorbing aerogels from choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvent pretreated and silylated cellulose nanofibrils for selective oil removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(29):25029–25037. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0630410.1021/acsami.7b06304 ↗
81. Lazzari LK, Zampieri VB, Zanini M, Zattera AJ, Baldasso C (2017) Sorption capacity of hydrophobic cellulose cryogels silanized by two different methods. Cellulose 24(8):3421–3431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1349-z10.1007/s10570-017-1349-z ↗
82. Lee K-Y, Quero F, Blaker JJ, Hill CAS, Eichhorn SJ, Bismarck A (2011) Surface only modification of bacterial cellulose nanofibres with organic acids. Cellulose 18(3):595–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z ↗
83. Lee JH, Park SH, Kim SH (2020) Surface alkylation of cellulose nanocrystals to enhance their compatibility with polylactide. Polymers 12(1):17810.3390/polym12010178 ↗
84. Li L, Neivandt DJ (2019) The mechanism of alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) sizing on cellulose model films studied by sum frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy. Cellulose 26(5):3415–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02295-210.1007/s10570-019-02295-2 ↗
85. Li Z, Pan X (2018) Strategies to modify physicochemical properties of hemicelluloses from biorefinery and paper industry for packaging material. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 17(1):47–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-018-9460-710.1007/s11157-018-9460-7 ↗
86. Li X, Tian J, Garnier G, Shen W (2010) Fabrication of paper-based microfluidic sensors by printing. Colloids Surf B 76(2):564–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.12.02310.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.12.023 ↗
87. Li M-F, Sun S-N, Xu F, Sun R-C (2011) Cold NaOH/urea aqueous dissolved cellulose for benzylation: synthesis and characterization. Eur Polym J 47(9):1817–1826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.06.01310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.06.013 ↗
88. Li D, Zhou J, Ma X, Li J (2019) Synthesis of a novel biocomposite of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) reinforced with acetylated cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose 26(16):8729–8743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02708-210.1007/s10570-019-02708-2 ↗
89. Lindfors J, Salmi J, Laine J, Stenius P (2007) AKD and ASA model surfaces: preparation and characterization. BioResources 2(4):200710.15376/biores.2.4.652-670 ↗
90. Lindström T, Larsson PT (2008) Alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) sizing—a review. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23(2):202–20910.3183/npprj-2008-23-02-p202-209 ↗
91. Lowe AB (2010) Thiol-ene “click” reactions and recent applications in polymer and materials synthesis. Polym Chem 1(1):17–36. https://doi.org/10.1039/B9PY00216B10.1039/B9PY00216B ↗
92. Ly B, Belgacem MN, Bras J, Brochier Salon MC (2010) Grafting of cellulose by fluorine-bearing silane coupling agents. Mater Sci Eng C 30(3):343–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2009.11.00910.1016/j.msec.2009.11.009 ↗
93. Missoum K, Bras J, Belgacem MN (2012) Organization of aliphatic chains grafted on nanofibrillated cellulose and influence on final properties. Cellulose 19(6):1957–1973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9780-710.1007/s10570-012-9780-7 ↗
94. Missoum K, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose surface modification: a review. Materials 6(5):1745–176610.3390/ma6051745 ↗
95. Müller Y, Tot I, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Zimmermann R, Eichhorn K-J, Nitschke C, Scherr G, Freudenberg U, Werner C (2010) The impact of esterification reactions on physical properties of cellulose thin films. Soft Matter 6(15):3680–3684. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0SM00005A10.1039/C0SM00005A ↗
96. Mulyadi A, Zhang Z, Deng Y (2016) Fluorine-free oil absorbents made from cellulose nanofibril aerogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(4):2732–2740. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b1098510.1021/acsami.5b10985 ↗
97. Navarro JRG, Conzatti G, Yu Y, Fall AB, Mathew R, Edén M, Bergström L (2015) Multicolor fluorescent labeling of cellulose nanofibrils by click chemistry. Biomacromolecules 16(4):1293–1300. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0008310.1021/acs.biomac.5b00083 ↗
98. Neltner TG, Kulkarni NR, Alger HM, Maffini MV, Bongard ED, Fortin ND, Olson ED (2011) Navigating the U.S. food additive regulatory program. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 10(6):342–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00166.x10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00166.x ↗
99. Nypelö T, Berke B, Spirk S, Sirviö JA (2021) Review: periodate oxidation of wood polysaccharides—modulation of hierarchies. Carbohydr Polym 252:117105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11710510.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117105 ↗
100. Orsolini P, Antonini C, Stojanovic A, Malfait WJ, Caseri WR, Zimmermann T (2018) Superhydrophobicity of nanofibrillated cellulose materials through polysiloxane nanofilaments. Cellulose 25(2):1127–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1636-810.1007/s10570-017-1636-8 ↗