On the effects of modifiers on the viscoelastic behavior of composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Some of the details concerning the reasons for the difference in behavior between untoughened and toughened composites are presented. This work demonstrates the influence of localized plastic deformation on the viscoelastic behavior of polymer composites. As an example, the presence of a thermoplastic modifier and its potential influence on the microscale deformation is presented by using two micromechanical models to determine the conditions under which the observed behavior may occur. Results suggest that the effect of thermoplastic tougheners is to increase the amount of time‐dependent plastic deformation in loadings that produce sufficiently large local stress concentrations. The tougheners, however, do not seem to change the functional form of the time‐dependent response, rather they change the magnitude of this response. The two models discussed are used to qualitatively characterize these phenomena by relating model parameters to constituent properties. Differences in observed behavior with respect to plastic deformation in creep tests vs. tests such as dynamic mechanical analysis are attributed to the small deformations in the latter test types, which do create insufficient localized zones of plastic deformation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pen.76033210410.1002/pen.760332104 ↗
2. 10.1177/00219983890230110410.1177/002199838902301104 ↗
3. T. S.Gates “Matrix Dominated Stress/Strain Behavior in Polymeric Composites: Effects of Hold Time Nonlinearity and Rate Dependency ” NASA Technical Memorandum 107595 (April1992).10.1520/STP12627S ↗
4. A.Pasricha M. E.Tuttle andA. F.Emery Proc. Amer. Soc. Comp. 7th Tech. Conf. p.792–803 University Park Pa. (October1992).
5. A. Y.Lou Proc. ASM Intl. 3rd Annual Conf. on Adv. Comp. Detroit (September1987).
6. Bareš R. · 1991 · 49410.1007/978-94-011-3856-7_42 ↗
7. 10.1122/1.54966610.1122/1.549666 ↗
8. 10.1177/00219983710050020610.1177/002199837100500206 ↗
9. R. A.Schapery “Further Development of a Thermodynamic Constitutive Theory: Stress Formation ” Purdue University Rept. No. 69‐2 (February1969).
10. R. A.Schapery Proc. Seventh Intl. Congress on Experimental Mechanics p.9–21 Las Vegas (June1992).
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90103-610.1016/0266-3538(89)90103-6 ↗
12. 10.1080/0021846910802650310.1080/00218469108026503 ↗
13. 10.1016/0022-5096(90)90035-310.1016/0022-5096(90)90035-3 ↗
14. Sun C. T. · 1987 · 1.250
15. 10.1002/pc.75012040810.1002/pc.750120408 ↗
16. D. E.Walrath Exper. Mech. June1991 p.111.10.1007/BF02327561 ↗
17. Kinloch A. J. · 1985
18. K. M.LiechtiandY. M.Liang Proc. Intl. Cong. Appl. Mech. Haifa Israel (August1992).
19. Goodier J. N. · J. Appl. Mech. · 1933 · 1 · 3910.1115/1.4012173 ↗
20. 10.1177/00219983830170030310.1177/002199838301700303 ↗
21. 10.1016/0167-6636(91)90013-P10.1016/0167-6636(91)90013-P ↗
22. M. Jones, R. · 1975
23. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90216-F10.1016/0956-7151(93)90216-F ↗
24. 10.1177/00219983930270100410.1177/002199839302701004 ↗
25. R. G.StringfellowandD. M.Parks “A Self—Consistent Model of Isotropic Viscoplastic Behavior in Multiphase Materials ” MIT Industrial Liason Program Report (April 28 1990).
26. 10.1098/rspa.1957.013310.1098/rspa.1957.0133 ↗
27. T. K.Tsotsis unpublished research.
28. 10.1002/app.1993.07050100210.1002/app.1993.070501002 ↗