Simulations of cyclic, transient variations of mold temperatures in the SMC compression molding process
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The dual reciprocity boundary element technique is used to simulate the cyclic SMC compression molding process, taking into account the heat transfer within the whole mold. The cyclic, transient variations in mold temperatures at different mold locations are illustrated through the analysis of a plate mold. The transient temperature fluctuation near the mold cavity surface is much larger than that away from it. It was also found that owing to the high heating fluid temperature (compared with the ambient air temperature), the heat transfer at the mold exterior surface shows a significant effect on the mold temperature distribution, especially when the mold is a small or medium size. The present method provides a complete and more accurate description of the mold temperature variation during the whole cycle history by including the mold as the analysis domain, meanwhile minimizing the computation time. Other analysis methods, including the constant mold wall temperature approach, the hybrid shape‐factor/finite element method, as well as the cycle‐averaged boundary element technique imposed with 1‐D transient analysis, basically overestimate mold wall temperatures and the associated charge conversion rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Kubel E. J. · Adv. Materials and Processes · 1989 · 17
2. J. K.Rogers Plastics Technology Sept.1988 p.47.
3. Composites Bulletin SMC Automotive Center Dearborn Mich. (Feb.1989).
4. J. P.Reardon Machine Design 48(Jan.1990).
5. 10.1002/pc.75006020810.1002/pc.750060208 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.75002041210.1002/pc.750020412 ↗
7. Kau H. T. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1987 · 33 · 27
8. 10.1002/pc.75001010510.1002/pc.750010105 ↗
9. G.MengesandH.Derek Proc. 36th SPI Reinforced Plastics/Composites Isntitute session 23‐C (1981).
10. 10.1002/pen.76023020410.1002/pen.760230204 ↗
11. 10.1016/0377-0257(80)85012-910.1016/0377-0257(80)85012-9 ↗
12. Tucker C. L. · 1987 · 481
13. 10.1115/1.318592110.1115/1.3185921 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.317176510.1115/1.3171765 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.76021080810.1002/pen.760210808 ↗
16. 10.1002/pen.76029110710.1002/pen.760291107 ↗
17. 10.1002/pen.76027030710.1002/pen.760270307 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.75007030310.1002/pc.750070303 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.75015050210.1002/pc.750150502 ↗
20. Austin C. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1985 · 31 · 764
21. Kwon T. H. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1986 · 32 · 110
22. Himasekhar K. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1988 · 34 · 352
23. 10.1016/0735-1933(91)90033-Z10.1016/0735-1933(91)90033-Z ↗
24. Chen S. C. · Chung Yuan Journal · 1990 · 19 · 82
25. 10.1007/978-3-662-11273-1_2210.1007/978-3-662-11273-1_22 ↗
26. Brebbia C. A. · 1987 · 55
27. 10.1115/1.282256610.1115/1.2822566 ↗
28. Hu S. Y. · Plast. Rub. Compos. Proc. · 1995 · 23 · 221
29. 10.1002/pc.75014060810.1002/pc.750140608 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.76026110610.1002/pen.760261106 ↗
31. Brebbia C. A. · 198410.1007/978-3-642-48860-3 ↗
32. Throne J. L. · 1979