journal article·2022-10

Failure mechanism of unidirectional basalt fiber‐reinforced polymer composites with pretension of fiber yarns

Xing Zhao, Sihao Li, Xin Wang, Zhishen Wu, Jin Wu

Polymer Composites· Volume 43· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The pultrusion process has received increasing attention because of its high productivity, low cost, and good product quality. During the pultrusion process, the pulling and pretension force is a key factor to control the quality of the products. In this paper, the effect of the pretension force on the tensile strength of basalt fiber‐reinforced polymer (BFRP) composites was studied. The pretension force was controlled using different weights. Tensile tests were performed on the BFRP specimens and the microscopic analysis was examined by scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the static tensile strength of specimens climbed up initially, followed by a decrease with the increase of pretension weights. Three microscopic changes under different pretension forces were found and discussed to explain the damage and failure mechanism. It is essential to optimize the pretension force to improve the strength quality for the pultrusion products of BFRP.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering and Airport Engineering Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China

National and Local Unified Engineering Research Center for Basalt Fiber Production and Application Technology International Institute for Urban Systems Engineering, Southeast University Nanjing China

Key Laboratory of C & PC Structures Ministry of Education Southeast University Nanjing China

Funding

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000119410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001194 ↗
2. 10.3844/ajassp.2014.1798.181010.3844/ajassp.2014.1798.1810 ↗
3. 10.1177/089270570605544810.1177/0892705706055448 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.032 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.772.39910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.772.399 ↗
6. 10.1106/00219980302867610.1106/002199803028676 ↗
7. 10.1177/002199830303700367510.1177/0021998303037003675 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.093 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12289-008-0264-010.1007/s12289-008-0264-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10881210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108812 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2475110.1002/pc.24751 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00170-017-0049-z10.1007/s00170-017-0049-z ↗
13. 10.1007/s12289-020-01540-510.1007/s12289-020-01540-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10601310.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106013 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000097010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000970 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-018-2260-110.1007/s10853-018-2260-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11812110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118121 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00115-210.1016/S1359-835X(97)00115-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.025 ↗
21. 10.1080/09243046.2019.165032210.1080/09243046.2019.1650322 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41565-018-0141-z10.1038/s41565-018-0141-z ↗
23. 10.1007/s10853-016-0052-z10.1007/s10853-016-0052-z ↗
24. 10.1007/s10853-017-0996-710.1007/s10853-017-0996-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.018 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.10.04510.1016/j.matlet.2009.10.045 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00193-010.1016/S0020-7683(98)00193-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.05610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.056 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1413376310.3390/ma14133763 ↗