journal article·2019-02

A new approach to fabricate carbon fiber reinforced polymer with roller pre‐stretching method and characterization of their mechanical properties

Ömer Bayraktar, Abdulmecit Guldas

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, an innovator, simple, and economical method named roller pre‐stretching is introduced to fabricate polymer‐based composite materials. Stretching technique was applied during vacuum infusion process to enhance the linearity of fibers in the unidirectional composite materials. An increasing linearity proportional together with increasing pre‐stretching was observed on scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. The determined experimental pre‐stretch values were 0, 1.8, 2.7, 4.1, 6.2, and 9.1 MPa. The effect of this method was evaluated under the favor of tensile and three‐point bending tests. Furthermore, volume fractions of the fibers were investigated. The experimental results indicated that the roller pre‐stretching method significantly increased ultimate tensile stress of the composites up to 39% and flexural stress of the composites up to 20%. In addition, stretching fibers over 4.1 MPa did not bring about any improvement on composites in terms of their mechanical properties. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:489–495, 2019. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Technology, Manufacturing Engineering Gazi University Ankara 06500 Turkey

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.24810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.248 ↗
2. Shindo Y. · 2012 · 1
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/0263-8223(93)90220-K10.1016/0263-8223(93)90220-K ↗
5. 10.1533/9780857094926.2.39910.1533/9780857094926.2.399 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.03310.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.033 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.sna.2008.07.01410.1016/j.sna.2008.07.014 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00049-910.1016/S1359-835X(98)00049-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.08710.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.087 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.04.09910.1016/j.matlet.2006.04.099 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.005 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0022-3115(98)00128-710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00128-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.03710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.037 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20140146510.1002/smll.201401465 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.023 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20080029510.1002/adma.200800295 ↗
19. Ö.Bayraktar “System Design and Production For Prestressed Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composite and The Production of Composite Materials ” M. Sc. Thesis Gazi Univesrity Turkey(2016).
20. ASTM. D3039‐14 ASTM International United States (2015).
21. ASTM. D790‐15 ASTM International United States (2015).
22. ASTM. D3171‐15 ASTM International United States (2015).
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.12310.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.123 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.12.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2015.12.015 ↗
25. 10.1115/1.183676610.1115/1.1836766 ↗
26. 10.1080/15583724.2012.70541010.1080/15583724.2012.705410 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.05110.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.051 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.08.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.08.007 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01709.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01709.x ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20080029510.1002/adma.200800295 ↗