journal article·2021-10

Failure analysis of fiberglass‐vinyl ester composite cylinders subjected to fire and asymmetric transient pressure

Ehsan Selahi, Ali Reza Setoodeh, Masoud Tahani

Polymer Composites· Volume 42· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A hybrid numerical method is developed for failure prediction of glass fiber reinforced vinyl ester (GRV) composite cylinders subjected to fire and asymmetric transient pressure. The method is composed of layerwise theory, differential quadrature method, Fourier series expansion, and Newmark's time integration method. To achieve high‐accuracy solution, the char formation, resin decomposition, volatile convection, and temperature‐dependent material properties are considered. By comparing the developed results with the experimental and numerical results presented in the available literatures, the precision of this method is confirmed. The results reveal that although the polymeric composites are flammable, they are also strong thermal insulators compared to conventional metals, which reduces the flame spread rate from one section to another.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Flame retardant materials and properties · Fire dynamics and safety research · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University Marvdasht Iran

Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Shiraz University of Technology Shiraz Iran

Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Mashhad Iran

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/1099-1018(200003/04)24:2<67::AID-FAM720>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/1099-1018(200003/04)24:2<67::AID-FAM720>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
2. 10.1023/A:101452062891510.1023/A:1014520628915 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00015-410.1016/S1359-835X(00)00015-4 ↗
4. 10.1023/A:102020491361210.1023/A:1020204913612 ↗
5. 10.1177/002199830404273310.1177/0021998304042733 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.006 ↗
7. 10.1177/002199830505554310.1177/0021998305055543 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199830606016410.1177/0021998306060164 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.04.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2007.04.013 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.03810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.038 ↗
11. 10.1177/002199830707873110.1177/0021998307078731 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.018 ↗
13. 10.1177/002199830934464210.1177/0021998309344642 ↗
14. 10.1177/002199830934464110.1177/0021998309344641 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.004 ↗
16. 10.1177/073168440708424510.1177/0731684407084245 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831039329510.1177/0021998310393295 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10694-009-0125-510.1007/s10694-009-0125-5 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10694-009-0122-810.1007/s10694-009-0122-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.023 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.14010.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.140 ↗
23. 10.1080/15376494.2011.62763910.1080/15376494.2011.627639 ↗
24. 10.1177/073168441351222610.1177/0731684413512226 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2567510.1002/pc.25675 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2575010.1002/pc.25750 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2578610.1002/pc.25786 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2580610.1002/pc.25806 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10821710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108217 ↗
30. Yang H. · Thin Walled Struct. · 2021 · 160 · 380
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.032 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.001 ↗
33. 10.1177/00219983850190060810.1177/002199838501900608 ↗
34. 10.1002/cnm.163003030310.1002/cnm.1630030303 ↗
35. Selahi E. · J. Solid Fluid Mech. · 2019 · 9 · 153
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.011 ↗
37. Kaw A. K. · 2006