journal article·2009-06

Surface and interface characterization of untreated and SMA Imide‐treated hemp fiber/acrylic composites

Tayebeh Behzad, Mohini Sain

Polymer Composites· Volume 30· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The hydrophilic nature of natural fibers adversely affects adhesion to a hydrophobic matrix, and consequently it may unfavorably influence the strength of the composite. Therefore, modifying the fiber or the matrix is essential to obtain optimum composite properties. In this work, hemp fibers were modified applying a paper sizing technique using SMA Imide resin (copolymer of styrene and dimethylaminopropylamine maleimide) as a surface modifying agent. The performance of the hemp/acrylic composite was improved significantly using the treated fibers. Inverse gas chromatography (IGC) and pull‐out test were employed to study the hemp fiber/matrix interface and the surface characteristics of untreated and treated hemp fibers. The IGC results demonstrated that treated fibers had slightly higher dispersive force compared with untreated fibers. Moreover, modification of fibers with SMA Imide resin slightly decreased the basic character and significantly increased the acid character of hemp fibers. From the pull‐out test, the average stress to pull the SMA‐treated fibers out was 71% higher than that calculated for untreated fibers. The higher interfacial strength for the treated fibers shows that the SMA treatment had a beneficial influence on the adhesion of the acrylic resin to the hemp fibers. POLYM. COMPOS., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Mapleston P. · Mod. Plast. · 1999 · 76 · 4
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
3. 10.1023/A:102101392191610.1023/A:1021013921916 ↗
4. 10.1002/app.1046010.1002/app.10460 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00094-010.1016/S0266-3538(03)00094-0 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.2106110.1002/app.21061 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.2262010.1002/app.22620 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.01.01610.1016/j.chemolab.2004.01.016 ↗
9. 10.1016/0166-6622(91)80169-O10.1016/0166-6622(91)80169-O ↗
10. 10.1021/la00035a04910.1021/la00035a049 ↗
11. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970801)65:5<1013::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970801)65:5<1013::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
12. D.Gulati “Modification of Interface in Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites” Master Thesis University of Toronto (2005).
13. Ferreira L. · Polymer · 2005 · 46 · 23
14. 10.1023/A:100479040915810.1023/A:1004790409158 ↗
15. Chand N. · Polym. Commun. · 1986 · 27 · 157
16. 10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00116-210.1016/S0142-9418(02)00116-2 ↗
17. T.Behzad M.Sain U.S. Patent 0 245 161 (2005).
18. 2005 · 01
19. 2005 · 01
20. Piggott M.R. · 2002
21. 10.1021/i360065a00210.1021/i360065a002 ↗
22. McNair H.M. · 1998
23. 10.1021/bk-1989-039110.1021/bk-1989-0391 ↗
24. 10.1080/0021846870808046910.1080/00218468708080469 ↗
25. 10.1006/jcis.1997.489210.1006/jcis.1997.4892 ↗
26. 10.1021/ie50660a00810.1021/ie50660a008 ↗
27. 10.1002/pen.2046510.1002/pen.20465 ↗