Mode‐I fracture behavior of carbon/epoxy plain‐weave composites containing double‐edge through‐the‐thickness cracks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A stress method to evaluate the stress intensity factor at the ends of a discontinuity contained by an orthotropic medium is developed. Unlike the classic stress method, of which determination of the stress intensity factor (SIF) is largely dependent on data collected from singularity‐dominated zone, the proposed stress method is based on a stress expression in the form of multiterm expansion, including two higher‐order terms. By adopting higher‐order terms, far‐field effect can be taken into consideration. Carbon/epoxy plain‐weave textile composites are prepared and tensile‐tested with double‐edge notched (DEN) configuration. Effective crack length ( a / W ) ranges from 0.064 to 0.624. Prediction of the proposed model matches the definition, $\sigma\infty\sqrt{\pi a}$ , with errors less than 5% for 0.064 < a / W < 0.402, whereas errors are reported up to 45.78% for 0.413 < a / W < 0.624. It is postulated that the errors beyond a / W = 0.4 results from finite geometry and interaction between cracks. A strain‐gage test is carried out to verify the proposed stress method, utilizing two strain gages to realize the three‐parameter strain gage method. The test result exhibits good agreement with the proposed method. POLYM. COMPOS. 27:213–220, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/224166a010.1038/224166a0 ↗
2. Y.Ando G.Yagawa andK.Okabayashi Proc. 2nd International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology G5/4 Berlin Germany September 10–14 (1973).
3. G.Yagawa T.Nishioka Y.Ando andN.Ogura “The Finite Element Calculation of Stress Intensity Factors Using Superposition ” in Sesion on Computational Fracture Mechanics Presented at 2nd National Congress on Pressure Vessels and Piping San Francisco CA ASME 21 (1975).
4. 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90026-310.1016/0013-7944(70)90026-3 ↗
5. Lekhnitskii S.G. · 1963
6. Muskhelishvili N.I. · 1953
7. 10.1007/BF0018685410.1007/BF00186854 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0232500210.1007/BF02325002 ↗
9. 10.1016/0013-7944(75)90014-410.1016/0013-7944(75)90014-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/0020-7403(90)90022-B10.1016/0020-7403(90)90022-B ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0232140110.1007/BF02321401 ↗
12. 10.1007/978-94-009-8340-310.1007/978-94-009-8340-3 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.401145410.1115/1.4011454 ↗
14. 10.1016/1359-835X(95)00008-P10.1016/1359-835X(95)00008-P ↗
15. M.B.BuczekandC.T.Herakovich AMD (Symposia Series; American Society of Mechanical Engineers Applied Mechanics Division) 58 75(1983).
16. 10.1016/0013-7944(73)90027-110.1016/0013-7944(73)90027-1 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.401154710.1115/1.4011547 ↗
18. 10.1177/00219983730070020110.1177/002199837300700201 ↗
19. 10.1016/0013-7944(89)90318-410.1016/0013-7944(89)90318-4 ↗
20. Dash P.K. · J. Inst. Eng. Aerospace Div. · 2004 · 85 · 1