Power issues in the manufacturing and characterization of polymers and composite materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA), although utilized for more than three decades, has been restricted so far to material characterization rather than processing. Recently the importance of power for describing viscoelasticity in prepreg process operations has been demonstrated. This present work views DMA as an integral part of the power analysis of processes. In this study, four types of prepreg were produced under the same power of impregnation utilizing epoxy resins with various PEI contents. Prepregs were tested for compressive and toughness power as well as loss power. Laminates were developed and analyzed by DMA. DMA data was treated according to the established power methodology and compared with the tack power of the original prepreg. Specific compressive power was generally found to increase with increasing storage DMA power, while specific toughness power was found to show the opposite trend. The inverse of power, defined as tolerance, was also investigated. The out‐of‐phase DMA tolerance was found to correlate to loss prepreg power, bringing a deeper understanding to the fundamentals of viscoelasticity formation. This analytical methodology can be applied beneficially to many topics to provide a better understanding of polymers and composites, as well as smart materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Lee W. J. · SAMPE Quarterly · 1986 · 17 · 58
2. 10.1002/pen.76033180510.1002/pen.760331805 ↗
3. M.HoisingtonandJ. C.Seferis “Process‐Structure‐Process Relationships for Layered Structured Composites ”Proc. 6th Technical Conf. of the American Society for Composites (1991).
4. F. U.BuehlerandJ. C.Seferis “Prepreg Manufacturing Process Descriptors ”28th Intern. SAMPE Tech. Conf. 1342(1996).
5. Seferis J. C. · SAMPE Quarterly · 1989 · 20 · 55
6. 10.1002/pen.1019710.1002/pen.10197 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.1026410.1002/pc.10264 ↗
8. Dahlquist C. A. · Adhesives Age · 1959 · 2 · 25
9. 10.1016/0143-7496(81)90035-X10.1016/0143-7496(81)90035-X ↗
10. Bull R. F. · Adhesives Age · 1968 · 11 · 20
11. 10.1515/SECM.1995.4.3.14310.1515/SECM.1995.4.3.143 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.75013030810.1002/pc.750130308 ↗
13. Ahn K. J. · SAMPE Quarterly · 1992 · 23 · 54
14. 10.1002/app.1992.07045030410.1002/app.1992.070450304 ↗
15. J. D.Lean P. S.Gill andE. I. DuPontde Nemours “Derivation and Testing of New Data Analysis Equations for the DuPont DMA ”1981 NATAS Conference 695(1981).
16. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00020-110.1016/S1359-835X(97)00020-1 ↗
17. Putnam J. W. · J. Adv. Mater. · 1995 · 27 · 47
18. 10.1016/S0040-6031(96)03084-510.1016/S0040-6031(96)03084-5 ↗
19. B. S.HayesandJ. C.Seferis “Prepreg System Modeling Methodology ”28th Intern. SAMPE Tech. Conf. 1327(1996).