journal article·2018-12

Multi‐objective optimization of post‐curing process for GNPs reinforced glass fabric/epoxy nanocomposite laminae

Georgios V. Seretis, Georgios N. Kouzilos, Dimitrios E. Manolakos, Christopher G. Provatidis

Polymer Composites· Volume 39· Issue S4
Publisher page

Abstract

Post‐curing processes are fundamental manufacturing operations for epoxy matrix composites from which high‐quality parts are produced and see service in a great variety of industrial applications. Although many parameters affect these processes, only temperature is considered as affecting factor in most of the relevant studies. In this study, a multi‐parameter design of experiments, using Taguchi method, has been conducted in order to investigate the optimum post‐curing conditions for graphene nanoplatelets reinforced glass fabric/epoxy nanocomposite laminae. Both post‐curing temperature Tpc and time tpc were treated as independent variables in a L9 Taguchi orthogonal array addressing three levels each. Ultimate tensile strength and strain at break were examined as pre‐selected quality objectives. Through the multiple regression analysis performed, a highly accurate regression model was achieved for both optimization criteria. Finally, a multi‐objective optimization genetic algorithm was used for the above models. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:E2483–E2489, 2018. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Technical University of Athens, School of Mechanical Engineering Zografou Athens 15780 Greece

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.04.02510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.04.025 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.001 ↗
4. Seretis G.V. · Compos. B Eng. · 2017 · 1 · 18
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/NHC.15.2610.4028/www.scientific.net/NHC.15.26 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.27210.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.272 ↗
7. Jefferson A.J. · Compos. Struct. · 2016 · 143
8. 10.1080/0305215X.2013.83223410.1080/0305215X.2013.832234 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.11.00510.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.11.005 ↗
10. Douglas C.M. · 2001
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.02810.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.028 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.07710.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.077 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.03610.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.036 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2004.08.00310.1016/j.cej.2004.08.003 ↗
15. 10.1080/10426914.2010.52958710.1080/10426914.2010.529587 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.09.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.09.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.025 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.05810.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.058 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.069 ↗