Multi‐objective optimization of post‐curing process for GNPs reinforced glass fabric/epoxy nanocomposite laminae
Source abstract
Abstract
Post‐curing processes are fundamental manufacturing operations for epoxy matrix composites from which high‐quality parts are produced and see service in a great variety of industrial applications. Although many parameters affect these processes, only temperature is considered as affecting factor in most of the relevant studies. In this study, a multi‐parameter design of experiments, using Taguchi method, has been conducted in order to investigate the optimum post‐curing conditions for graphene nanoplatelets reinforced glass fabric/epoxy nanocomposite laminae. Both post‐curing temperature Tpc and time tpc were treated as independent variables in a L9 Taguchi orthogonal array addressing three levels each. Ultimate tensile strength and strain at break were examined as pre‐selected quality objectives. Through the multiple regression analysis performed, a highly accurate regression model was achieved for both optimization criteria. Finally, a multi‐objective optimization genetic algorithm was used for the above models. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:E2483–E2489, 2018. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Technical University of Athens, School of Mechanical Engineering Zografou Athens 15780 Greece
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.04.02510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.04.025 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.001 ↗
4. Seretis G.V. · Compos. B Eng. · 2017 · 1 · 18
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/NHC.15.2610.4028/www.scientific.net/NHC.15.26 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.27210.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.272 ↗
7. Jefferson A.J. · Compos. Struct. · 2016 · 143
8. 10.1080/0305215X.2013.83223410.1080/0305215X.2013.832234 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.11.00510.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.11.005 ↗
10. Douglas C.M. · 2001
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.02810.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.028 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.07710.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.077 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.03610.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.036 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2004.08.00310.1016/j.cej.2004.08.003 ↗
15. 10.1080/10426914.2010.52958710.1080/10426914.2010.529587 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.09.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.09.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.025 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.05810.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.058 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.069 ↗