journal article·1982-07

Fatigue damage studies in high strength sheet‐molding compound fiberglass composites

R. Kundrat, S. Joneja, L. J. Broutman

Polymer Composites· Volume 3· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The materials considered in this investigation were oriented‐hybrid‐glass‐fiber‐reinforced vinyl ester resin sheet‐molding compound (SMC) composites. The composition of one material was 60 percent continuous glass and 5 percent random fibers, while the other was 45 percent continuous glass and 20 percent random fibers. The S‐N curves for the two materials were determined in the continuous fiber direction. The fatigue stress levels ranged from approximately 20 to 80 percent of each material's respective ultimate tensile strength. The residual tensile strengths of the fiber‐reinforced composites were not seriously reduced until near final fracture. The moduli of the composites in the fiber direction are also not reduced in any detectable manner. Damping measurements have shown that the damping increases during fatigue and that it is a sensitive measure of matrix and interface damage, generally debonding and cracking. It is shown by damping measurements that damage accumulates differently for two materials studied. The material with the higher percent of continuous glass appeared to be more cycle‐dependent, while the other was more stress‐dependent.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. M. J.Owen R.Dukes andT. R.Smith “Fatigue and Failure Mechanisms in GRP with Special Reference to Random Reinforcements ” Society of the Plastics Industry Reinforced Plastics and Composites Division 23rd Technical Conference Washington DC February 6–9 1968.
2. M. J.OwenandT. R.Smith “Some Fatigue Properties of CSM Polyester Resin Laminates ”Plastics and Polymers Feb 1968(Great Britain).
3. M. J.OwenandR. G.Rose “The Effect of Resin Flexibility on the Fatigue Behavior of Glass‐Reinforced Plastic ” 7th International Reinforced Plastics Conference of the British Plastics Federation Brighton October 20–22 1978.
4. Sims G. D. · Plastics Rubber: Mater. Applications · 1978 · 3 · 41
5. 10.1088/0022-3727/6/17/31210.1088/0022-3727/6/17/312 ↗
6. 10.1016/0010-4361(80)90377-810.1016/0010-4361(80)90377-8 ↗
7. Owen M. J. · 1974
8. S.Sahu MS Thesis Illinois Institute of Technology June1968.
9. Agarwal B. D. · 1979
10. B. D.Agarwal MS Thesis Illinois Institute of Technology June1970.
11. 10.1016/0010-4361(74)90581-310.1016/0010-4361(74)90581-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/0010-4361(74)90580-110.1016/0010-4361(74)90580-1 ↗
13. J.AuerbuchandH. T.Hahn “Fatigue and Proof Testing of Unidirectional Graphite Epoxy Composites ”Fatigue of Filamentary Composite Materials ASTMSTP 636 Philadelphia 1977.10.1520/STP27981S ↗
14. 10.1088/0022-3727/5/9/31910.1088/0022-3727/5/9/319 ↗
15. C. K.Dharan “Fatigue Failure Mechanisms in a Unidirectionally Reinforced Composite Material ”Fatigue of Composite MaterialsASTMSTP 569 1975.10.1520/STP33172S ↗