journal article·1998-10

Sliding mode interlaminar fracture toughness of interply hybrid composite materials

Shun‐Fa Hwang, Chih‐Ching Huang

Polymer Composites· Volume 19· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract To measure the sliding mode interlaminar fracture toughness of interply hybrid composites, end notched flexure (ENF) specimens with three different types of stacking sequence have been utilized. Finite element analysis is applied to separate the contribution from different modes on the strain energy release rate. In addition, the methods of beam theory, compliance, and compliance calibration to calculate the G C values are compared. The effects of interface friction, crack length, and specimen width are also discussed. The results show that the crack growth in the three types of specimens is dominated by the sliding mode and the Mode II interlaminar fracture toughness can be approximated. The compliance method is not recommended for hybrid ENF specimens and the effects of interface friction can be neglected. To get rid of the edge effect, the specimen width must be carefully chosen, while the fracture toughness does increase with the initial crack length.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. A. J.RussellandK. N.Street “Moisture and Temperature Effects on the Mixed‐Mode Delamination Fracture of Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy ”Delamination and Debonding of Materials ASTM STP 876 349 (1985).10.1520/STP36314S ↗
2. W. L.Bradley “Presentation at ASTM Task Group Meeting ”Committee D‐30 Charleston S.C. (1986).
3. 10.1002/pc.75008050810.1002/pc.750080508 ↗
4. M. L.Benzeggagh Y. J.Prel andF. X.De Charentenay Proc. First European Conf. Compos. Mater. 291(1985).
5. 10.1177/00219983890230080110.1177/002199838902300801 ↗
6. 10.1177/00219983860200060610.1177/002199838602000606 ↗
7. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90142-210.1016/0266-3538(94)90142-2 ↗
8. 10.1177/00219983950290110110.1177/002199839502901101 ↗
9. J. M.Whitney J. W.Gillespie Jr. andL. A.Carlsson Proc. Second Conf. Compos. Mater. 391(1987).
10. L. A.Carlsson J. W.Gillespie Jr. andJ. M.Whitney Proc. First Conf. Compos. Mater. 421(1986).
11. ASTM Task Group Meeting Minutes Committee D‐30.02.02 on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Reno Nev. (1988).
12. 10.1177/07316844860050030210.1177/073168448600500302 ↗
13. S.MallandN. K.Kochhar J. Technol. Res. 54(1986).
14. 10.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50009-710.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50009-7 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0002025810.1007/BF00020258 ↗
16. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90133-N10.1016/0266-3538(92)90133-N ↗
17. 10.1177/00219983900240090210.1177/002199839002400902 ↗
18. Williams M. L. · Bulletin Seismological Soc. America · 1959 · 49 · 19910.1785/BSSA0490020199 ↗
19. 10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-310.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90115-910.1016/0013-7944(87)90115-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/0013-7944(92)90137-410.1016/0013-7944(92)90137-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90220-710.1016/0013-7944(87)90220-7 ↗