Simultaneous interpenetrating networks for tough matrix composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Graphite fiber reinforced epoxy composites normally exhibit low impact strength, poor delamination resistance, and low damage tolerance. Because delamination is a matrix‐dominated failure mode, tougher matrix resins may be utilized to reduce or eliminate the adverse effects of delamination on the structural integrity of fiber composites. The effects of modifying epoxy network morphology by introducing polyurethane in the form of an interpentrating network were studied. The compatibility, toughness, and tensile properties of the matrix as well as the properties of the resultant laminates were evaluated. One of the conclusions arising was that the interpenetrating network morphology results in superior resin and composites toughness with increasing polyurethane content. However, the benefits of increased resin toughness did not necessarily translate into proportionally increased composite owing to the geomertical limitations placed on the plastic deformation zones in laminates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Mallick P. K. · 1988 · 1
2. Kramer E. J. · 1982 · 251
3. M. S.Sefton P. T.McGrail J. A.Peacock S. P.Wilkinson R. A.Crick M.Davies andG.Almen “Semi‐Inter‐penetrating Networks as a Route to Toughening of Epoxy Resin Matrix Composites.”19th Intl. SAMPE Tech. Conf. pp.700–10(1987).
4. An J. H. · 1988 · 270
5. 10.1007/978-1-4684-3830-710.1007/978-1-4684-3830-7 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3177-3_1710.1007/978-1-4613-3177-3_17 ↗
7. J. T.Hartnes “A Ducyanate Semi‐Interpenetrating Polymer Network (SIPN) Matrix Composite ” inToughened Composites pp.353–462 ASTM STP 937 Norman J.Johnston ed. Amer. Soc. Test. Mater. Philadephia(1987).10.1520/STP24393S ↗
8. 10.1016/0032-3861(88)90345-X10.1016/0032-3861(88)90345-X ↗
9. Manson J. A. · 1975 · 265
10. 10.1007/978-1-4684-2874-2_1710.1007/978-1-4684-2874-2_17 ↗
11. 10.1021/ba-1984-0208.ch00310.1021/ba-1984-0208.ch003 ↗
12. 10.1021/ba-1984-0208.ch00410.1021/ba-1984-0208.ch004 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.76015061110.1002/pen.760150611 ↗
14. C.Zweben W. S.Smith andM. W.Wardlc “Test Methods for Fiber Tensile Strength Composite Flexural Moduhis and Properties of Fabric Reinforced Laminates ” inComposite Mnterials: Testing and Design (5th Conference) p.228. ASTM STP 674 S. W.Tsai ed. Amer. Soc. Test. Mater. Philadelphia(1978).10.1520/STP36912S ↗
15. Adams G. C. · 1986 · 144
16. C. F.Griffin “Damage Tolerance of Toughened Resin Graphite Composites ” inToughened Composites ASTM STP 937 N. J.Johnston ed. Amer. Soc. Test. Mater. Philadelphia(1987).10.1520/STP24369S ↗
17. Adams G. C. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1983 · 29 · 541
18. G. C.Adams “Impact Fatigue of Polymers Using an Instrumented Drop Tower Device ” inInstrumented Impact Testing of Plastics and Composites pp.281–301 ASTM STP 936 S. L.Kessleret al eds. Amer. Soc. Test. Mater. Philadelphia(1987).10.1520/STP19385S ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0068841410.1007/BF00688414 ↗
20. 10.1002/app.1976.07020010810.1002/app.1976.070200108 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0080904810.1007/BF00809048 ↗
22. 10.1177/00219983910250090610.1177/002199839102500906 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0054102710.1007/BF00541027 ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0055493210.1007/BF00554932 ↗