Effect of carbon fabric type on the mechanical performance of 2D carbon/carbon composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A stabilized PAN fabric was carbonized and graphitized from 800°C to 2500°C. Two‐dimensional (2D) carbon/carbon composites were made using the stabilized PAN fabric, carbonized fabrics, and a resol‐type phenol‐formaldehyde resin. These composites were heat‐treated from 600°C to 2500°C. The influence of different heat‐treated fabrics and heat treatment on the fracture and flexural strength of these composites was also studied. The composite reinforced with higher heat‐treated fabrics showed a lower weight loss than that with lower heat‐treated fabrics. When the composites were graphitized at 2500°C, the loss was 49.7 wt% for the composite made with stabilized PAN fabric and 26 wt% for that with carbonized fabric at 2500°C. Those composites also have a higher density than composites produced by other methods. Composites made with stabilized PAN fabric exhibited a strong bonding in the fiber/matrix during pyrolysis. This composite showed catastrophic fracture and a smooth fracture surface with no fiber pullout. Composites made with higher carbonized fabrics exhibited a weak interface bonding. These composites showed a pseudo‐plastic fracture pattern with fiber pullout during pyrolysis. Composites made with carbonized fabrics at 2000°C and 2500°C showed the highest flexural strength at the prolysis temperature of 1000°C. Composites made with carbonized fabric at 1300°C showed the highest flexural strength above 1500°C to 2500°C. The composite made with stabilized PAN fabric exhibited the lowest flexural strength during pyrolysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0008-6223(87)90116-310.1016/0008-6223(87)90116-3 ↗
2. Newling D. O. · 1971 · 142
3. 10.1016/0008-6223(72)90053-X10.1016/0008-6223(72)90053-X ↗
4. 10.1016/0008-6223(80)90004-410.1016/0008-6223(80)90004-4 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0073566510.1007/BF00735665 ↗
6. Ko T. H. · SAMPE · 1992 · 28 · 17
7. 10.1002/pc.75014031010.1002/pc.750140310 ↗
8. Perry J. I. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1974 · 9 · 1794
9. 10.1007/978-94-011-1586-510.1007/978-94-011-1586-5 ↗
10. Bradshaw W. G. · Ceramic Bulletin · 1978 · 57 · 193
11. 10.1016/0008-6223(80)90049-410.1016/0008-6223(80)90049-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/0008-6223(88)90224-210.1016/0008-6223(88)90224-2 ↗
13. Jain P. K. · SAMPE Quart. · 1992 · 23 · 43
14. Delmonte J. · 1981
15. S. J.Monte G.Sugarman andD. J.Seeman Proc. 32nd Ann. Tech. Conf. SPI RP/C Inst. Washington D. C. (1977).
16. 10.1016/0010-4361(88)90008-010.1016/0010-4361(88)90008-0 ↗
17. Watt W. · 1971 · 23
18. Watt W. · 1974 · 3
19. 10.1016/0008-6223(86)90148-X10.1016/0008-6223(86)90148-X ↗
20. 10.1016/0008-6223(81)90112-310.1016/0008-6223(81)90112-3 ↗
21. 10.1038/257210a010.1038/257210a0 ↗
22. 10.1002/pola.1986.08024113410.1002/pola.1986.080241134 ↗
23. 10.1088/0022-3727/14/3/00610.1088/0022-3727/14/3/006 ↗
24. A.Shindo Report No. 317 Govt. Ind. Res. Inst. Osaka Japan (1961).
25. Watt W. · Appl. Polym. Symp. · 1969 · 9 · 215