journal article·1990-10

Fracture behavior of hybrid composites containing both short and continuous fibers

T. L. Lin, B. Z. Jang

Polymer Composites· Volume 11· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A method for improving the fracture resistance of brittle polymer composites was explored. This method involved the incorporation of short fibers in a thermosetting resin before being used for impregnating the continuous fibers or fabrics. The impact fracture energy and the maximum load experienced by the hybrid can be associated with the parameters of short fibers (e.g., volume fraction and mechanical properties). Electron micrographs of the fracture surfaces of the specimen loaded under mode I and mode II conditions indicate that the short fiber modified composites have a significantly greater fracture surface area and higher level of plastic deformation than the unmodified composites. The data from all the tests demonstrate that adding a small amount of short fibers can significantly improve the interlaminar fracture toughness and impact resistance of graphite/epoxy composites. However, a high volume fraction of added short fibers could make it difficult to out‐gas during compression‐molding, leading to a high void content and reduced mechanical properties of composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. W. L.BradleyandR. N.Cohen inDelamination and Debonding of Materials W. S.Johnson ed. ASTMSTP 876 Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials p.389 Philadelphia Pa.(1985).10.1520/STP36316S ↗
2. G. B.McKenna J. F.Mandell andF. J.McGarry Society of the Plastics Industry Ann. Tech. Conf. Proc. Section 13‐C Reinforced Plastics/Composites Institute SPI New York (1974).
3. 10.1007/BF0112002110.1007/BF01120021 ↗
4. Masters J. E. · 1987 · 96
5. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90002-X10.1016/0266-3538(89)90002-X ↗
6. 10.1177/08927057880010030510.1177/089270578800100305 ↗
7. R.Carcia R. E.Evans andR. J.Palmer inToughened Composites ASTMSTP 937 p.397 N. J.Johnston ed. ASTM Philadelphia Pa.(1987).
8. R.Garcia Methods of Improving the Matrix‐dominated Performance of Composite Structures NADC‐83058–60 July1983.
9. J. Y.Liau B. Z.Jang L. R.Hwang andR. C.Wilcox Plastic Eng. Nov.1988 p.33.
10. Lange F. F. · 1974 · 2
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-710.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-7 ↗
12. M. F.Hibbs M. K.Tse andW. L.Bradley inToughened Composites ASTMSTP 937 p.115 ASTM Philadelphia Pa.(1987).10.1520/STP24374S ↗
13. D. J.Wilkins J. R.Eisenmann R. A.Camin W. S.Margolis andR. A.Benson inDamage in Composite Materials ASTMSTP 775 p.168 ASTM Philadelphia Pa.(1980).
14. 10.1177/07316844820010040210.1177/073168448200100402 ↗
15. A. J.RussellandK. N.Street inDelamination and Debonding of Materials ASTMSTP 876 p.349 ASTM Philadelphia Pa.(1985).
16. P. W. R.Beaumont P. G.Riewald andC.Zweben inForeign Object Impact Damage to Composites ASTMSTP 568 p.134 ASTM Philadelphia Pa.(1974).10.1520/STP33154S ↗
17. Hunston D. L. · 1984 · 1
18. W. S.JohnsonandP. P.Mangalgiri inToughened Composites ASTMSTP 937 p.295 ASTM Philadelphia Pa.(1987).