Dynamic mechanical characterization of cure of a polyimide‐graphite fiber composite (PMR 15/Celion 6000)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Dynamic mechanical studies of thermosetting PMR 15 polyimide/Celion 6000 composites were used to characterize cure behavior. Variation in composite shear modules with cure time for laminates partially cured under 3.45 MPa pressure was compared with that of laminates fully cured under pressure to select a partially cured system whose behavior corresponded with that of the pressure‐cured composites. An empirical kinetic model was developed that relates relative composite shear moduli to cure time and temperature. This model, coupled with standard statistical techniques, was used in the determination of an overall activation energy, E = 145 kj/mole (35 kcal/mole) and order of reaction, n, for the cure reaction(s). The empirical relationship defining dynamic modulus as a function of time and temperature remained linear well into the glassy region. Changes in dynamic glass‐transition temperature and breadth of the transition peaks with cure time are discussed. Shear modulus and damping were found to be more sensitive measures of relative extent of cure than Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Synthesis and properties of polymers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aic.69020060310.1002/aic.690200603 ↗
2. 10.1002/pen.76013060910.1002/pen.760130609 ↗
3. 10.1002/pen.76019100510.1002/pen.760191005 ↗
4. 10.1002/pen.76019100610.1002/pen.760191006 ↗
5. 10.1002/pen.76019100710.1002/pen.760191007 ↗
6. 10.1021/bk-1980-0132.ch02610.1021/bk-1980-0132.ch026 ↗
7. 10.1016/0032-3861(72)90111-510.1016/0032-3861(72)90111-5 ↗
8. 10.1002/app.1977.07021031910.1002/app.1977.070210319 ↗
9. 10.1002/pen.76021070510.1002/pen.760210705 ↗
10. 10.1002/pen.76021120810.1002/pen.760211208 ↗
11. 10.1002/pen.76021141410.1002/pen.760211414 ↗
12. 10.1002/pen.76013031210.1002/pen.760130312 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.76014010910.1002/pen.760140109 ↗
14. 10.1002/pen.76015060310.1002/pen.760150603 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.76016120510.1002/pen.760161205 ↗
16. Hill D. R. J. · Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Org. Coat. Plast. Chem. · 1978 · 38 · 590
17. 10.1002/pc.75003030910.1002/pc.750030309 ↗
18. F. I.Hurwitz andJ. D.Whittenberger in “Technology Transfer ” Proc. Thirteenth National SAMPE Tech. Conf. pp.477–486 Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Azusa California (1981).
19. 10.1002/app.1972.07016040910.1002/app.1972.070160409 ↗
20. Serafini T. T. · 1976 · 202
21. (Also NASA TM‐X‐71682 1975).
22. Lubowitz H. R. · Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Polym. Chem. Polym. Prepr. · 1971 · 12 · 29
23. 10.1021/ma50004a06910.1021/ma50004a069 ↗
24. 10.1021/ma50004a07010.1021/ma50004a070 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.1980.07025060810.1002/app.1980.070250608 ↗
26. 10.1002/app.1981.07026012210.1002/app.1981.070260122 ↗
27. R. W.Lauver andR. D.Vannucci in “Enigma of the Eighties: Environment Economics Energy ” Proc. Twenty‐fourth National SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition Book 1 pp.522–532 Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Azusa California (1979).
28. (Also NASA TM 79068).
29. T. T.Serafini andR. D.Vannucci in “Reinforced Plastics‐Milestones 30 ” Proc. Thritieth Annual Reinforced Plastics Composites Conference section 14E pp.1–5 Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. (1975).
30. (Also NSA TM‐X‐71616.)
31. 10.1007/BF0072784810.1007/BF00727848 ↗
32. 10.1002/pen.76021141410.1002/pen.760211414 ↗
33. 10.1080/1558372690854589710.1080/15583726908545897 ↗
34. 10.1021/ma60076a01110.1021/ma60076a011 ↗
35. 10.1021/ma60076a01210.1021/ma60076a012 ↗
36. 10.1021/ma50006a03610.1021/ma50006a036 ↗