Mechanical properties of in situ composites based on partially miscible blends of polyetherimide and liquid crystalline polymers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Results related to the mechanical properties of in situ composites based on partially miscible blends of polyetherimide (Ultem) and liquid crystalline polymers (HX1000 and HX4000) are discussed. It is observed that, at least in terms of the tensile and flexural modulus, there is a positive deviation from the law of mixtures. These results are analyzed and an attempt is made to explain the origin of this synergistic behavior based upon morphological data. The behavior of these partially miscible systems is compared to that of an immiscible system (Ultem/Vectra) and also that of glass‐reinforced Ultem. Using blends subjected to two passes through a single screw extruder, and thereby increasing the mixing history of the Ultem/HX4000 blend, led to improved dispersion but did not lead to any measurable improvement, within experimental error, in the tensile modulus or ultimate strength (though the toughness was enhanced). The dynamic creep compliance was measured and the creep behavior with composition and temperature is discussed. The data seem to suggest that a number of factors (including partial miscibility, the properties of the specific LCP chosen as the reinforcement and the final blend morphology) all interact in a complex and as yet undetermined manner to produce the enhanced mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Applications · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pen.76030090610.1002/pen.760300906 ↗
2. 10.1002/pen.76027060610.1002/pen.760270606 ↗
3. Blizard D. G. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1986 · 32 · 311
4. 10.1002/pc.75008030510.1002/pc.750080305 ↗
5. 10.1002/pen.76027090910.1002/pen.760270909 ↗
6. 10.1002/pen.76028170410.1002/pen.760281704 ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.76029090210.1002/pen.760290902 ↗
8. A.Sukhadia PhD dissertation Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg V. (1991).
9. J. A.Rock U.S. Patent 4 871 817 awarded toGeneral Electric Company Pittsfield Mass. on (3 October1989).
10. 10.1002/pen.76030170410.1002/pen.760301704 ↗
11. A.IsayevandS.Swaminathan U.S. Patent 4 835 047 on 30 May1989.
12. A.IsayevandS.Swaminathan Proc. Third Ann. Conf. on Adv. Compos. 259(1987).
13. 10.1177/00219983910250070110.1177/002199839102500701 ↗
14. S. S.Bafna T.Sun J. P.DeSouza andD. G.Baird submitted toPolymer.
15. S. S.Bafna J. P.De Souza T.Sun andD. G.Baird accepted for publication in the special ACS San Francisco Meeting Edition ofPolymer(1992).
16. Baird D. G. · 1990 · 416
17. Ferry J. D. · 1970
18. 10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
19. G.Crevecoeur PhD dissertation Catholic University Louvain Belgium (1991).
20. De Souza J. P. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1992 · 38 · 2236
21. Ward I. M. · 1979