Failure Mechanisms of Short Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials Subjected to Dynamic Loading
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The mechanical behavior of short carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid (SCF/PLA) composites fabricated by fused deposition modeling (FDM) is crucial for engineering applications, yet their strain‐rate dependence is not fully understood. This study aims to investigate the tensile response and fracture mechanisms of SCF/PLA under varying strain rates. Dog‐bone specimens were tested under quasi‐static (10 −4 s −1 ) and dynamic loading up to 50 s −1 , and fracture surfaces were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results indicate clear strain‐rate sensitivity: Young's modulus increased from 2.1 to 2.4 GPa, and fracture strength in MPa followed a power‐law relationship with strain rate in s –1 ( σ = 38· ε̇ 0.065 ). SEM observations reveal a transition from flat fracture surfaces dominated by matrix cracking and fiber/matrix debonding at low rates to rougher surfaces with increased fiber pull‐out, fiber fracture, and matrix cracking at high rates. The number of exposed fibers increased whilst their pull‐out length decreased, suggesting enhanced interfacial shear strength. These findings demonstrate pronounced rate‐dependent mechanical and microstructural behavior, providing essential insights for designing FDM‐printed SCF/PLA components in dynamic applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an China
Department of Mechanical Engineering Imperial College London London UK
Department of Aerospace Engineering Khalifa University of Science and Technology Masdar City UAE
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2731410.1002/pc.27314 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10893310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108933 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10663410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106634 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10805410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.108054 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10810210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108102 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-3-030-48259-610.1007/978-3-030-48259-6 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.10334610.1016/j.rinp.2020.103346 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.03310.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.03010.1016/j.addma.2019.03.030 ↗
10. 10.1177/089270572095319310.1177/0892705720953193 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1402046610.3390/ma14020466 ↗
12. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.7810.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.78 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40964‐019‐00092‐810.1007/s40964‐019‐00092‐8 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1209185710.3390/polym12091857 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11045510.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110455 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.07.02810.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.07.028 ↗
17. 10.1177/0731684423116755110.1177/07316844231167551 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11665‐017‐3065‐010.1007/s11665‐017‐3065‐0 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11665‐021‐05694‐410.1007/s11665‐021‐05694‐4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.00610.1016/j.addma.2019.05.006 ↗
21. 10.1088/2053‐1591/ab3ff310.1088/2053‐1591/ab3ff3 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10011210.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100112 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
24. 10.1007/s40436‐014‐0097‐710.1007/s40436‐014‐0097‐7 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199831881245210.1177/0021998318812452 ↗
26. 10.1177/0954406225132303410.1177/09544062251323034 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10863810.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108638 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.12110.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.121 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10853‐008‐3233‐610.1007/s10853‐008‐3233‐6 ↗
30. Strain Rate Sensitivity of Polymers in Compression From Low to High Rates
31. 10.1108/RPJ‐11‐2021‐030110.1108/RPJ‐11‐2021‐0301 ↗
32. 10.1108/RPJ‐12‐2019‐031710.1108/RPJ‐12‐2019‐0317 ↗
33. 10.1557/s43578‐021‐00248‐910.1557/s43578‐021‐00248‐9 ↗
34. 10.3390/polym1507170810.3390/polym15071708 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.497158510.1063/1.4971585 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10897710.1016/j.matdes.2020.108977 ↗
37. 10.3390/polym1212292410.3390/polym12122924 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0921‐5093(96)10880‐710.1016/S0921‐5093(96)10880‐7 ↗
39. 10.1177/08927057166328610.1177/089270571663286 ↗
40. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics ” ASTM D638‐14.
41. 10.1007/BF0054917810.1007/BF00549178 ↗
42. 10.1016/0022‐5096(88)90017‐810.1016/0022‐5096(88)90017‐8 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11207310.1016/j.compositesb.2024.112073 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10968710.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109687 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11719610.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117196 ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0001317110.1007/BF00013171 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.34494610.1063/1.344946 ↗
48. Matthews F. L. · 1999
49. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10461210.1016/j.addma.2024.104612 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11141510.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111415 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.09.00710.1016/j.ijplas.2019.09.007 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.10840510.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108405 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.10489910.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104899 ↗