Enhancing Mechanical Performance of Carbon Black‐Filled Rubber Nanocomposites With Na 2 Ti 3 O 7 Nanorods Reinforcement for Tire Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Rubber materials require nanofiller reinforcement to overcome their intrinsic low modulus and stress‐at‐elongation limitations. Although traditional carbon black (CB) enhances mechanical properties, its aggregation‐induced filler networks exacerbate dynamic hysteresis and heat generation. Silica nanoparticles reduce rolling resistance but face challenges in limited tensile strength improvements. Emerging fillers like carbon nanotubes and graphene suffer from dispersion issues or excessive heat generation. Herein, monodisperse sodium titanate (Na 2 Ti 3 O 7 , NTO) nanorods with high aspect ratios (2–300) were synthesized via a one‐step hydrothermal method and incorporated into CB/natural rubber (NR) composites. The NTO(20)/CB(30)/NR system exhibited superior static/dynamic performance: tensile strength (+16%), stress at 100% elongation (+211%), 28% lower compression heat build‐up, 204% extended fatigue life, and 11% reduced Akron abrasion loss. These enhancements stem from NTO's high surface area strengthening rubber‐filler interactions and rod‐like morphology disrupting CB networks. This work demonstrates a scalable hybrid filler strategy to advance sustainable rubber technologies for high‐performance industrial and mobility applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Polymer Science and Engineering Qingdao University of Science & Technology Qingdao China
Qingdao New Energy Shandong Laboratory, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.03810.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.038 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.08.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2017.08.025 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10805310.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108053 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.27410.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.274 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.clet.2024.10083710.1016/j.clet.2024.100837 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.thradv.2024.10001910.1016/j.thradv.2024.100019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15271410.1016/j.cej.2024.152714 ↗
8. 10.1016/0045‐7825(96)01001‐810.1016/0045‐7825(96)01001‐8 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41586‐023‐06782‐210.1038/s41586‐023‐06782‐2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10582210.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105822 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.00210.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.05310.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.053 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10658910.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106589 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11084710.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110847 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10948210.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109482 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.02.02010.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.02.020 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11188710.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111887 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.12.01010.1016/j.polymer.2017.12.010 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.coco.2024.10183610.1016/j.coco.2024.101836 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10830110.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108301 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.016 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11007510.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110075 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.03.00710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.03.007 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10709410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107094 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10538810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105388 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.015 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2550310.1002/pc.25503 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10990710.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109907 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10676410.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106764 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.05410.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.054 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.04810.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.048 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymer.2024.12764310.1016/j.polymer.2024.127643 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11313710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113137 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.018 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11060210.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110602 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.5b0648010.1021/acsami.5b06480 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymer.2024.12668210.1016/j.polymer.2024.126682 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.08.06510.1016/j.polymer.2016.08.065 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.2608010.1002/pc.26080 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10735810.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107358 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10701210.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107012 ↗