Effect of Exfoliated, Oxidized Molybdenum Disulfide on Mechanical and Tribological Properties of NBR / BR Blends
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Enhancing wear resistance is crucial for improving the durability of rubber products while minimizing the release of rubber particles into the environment. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) is a promising reinforcing filler, but the tendency of its sheets to stack together limits dispersion within rubber matrices. To overcome this challenge, we present a straightforward method for liquid‐phase exfoliation and partial oxidation of MoS 2 using CaCl 2 and H 2 O 2 , assisted by ultrasonication. The successful exfoliation–oxidation process is confirmed through multiple characterization techniques, all complementing each other. The effects of virgin MoS 2 (M) and exfoliated, oxidized MoS 2 (MO) on swelling behavior, mechanical performance, tribological properties, and thermal stability of an NBR/BR blend are systematically analyzed. MO sheets exhibit superior dispersion, effectively reducing wear‐induced weight loss from 15.2% in the pristine blend to 9.9% at a 4 phr MO loading. Additionally, incorporating 4 phr MO into the blend substantially enhances crosslink density (261%), tensile strength (96%), tear strength (70%), and thermal stability (63% increase in residual mass at 700°C). Notably, while adding M to the blend system enhanced these properties, the improvements were relatively lower in magnitude. These findings offer a promising approach to developing multifunctional rubber nanocomposites for industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Lubricants and Their Additives · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanomaterials and Polymer Nanocomposites Laboratory, School of Engineering University of British Columbia Kelowna British Columbia Canada
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2771210.1002/pc.27712 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2959710.1002/pc.29597 ↗
3. 10.1002/app.5018910.1002/app.50189 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10847410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108474 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.wear.2022.20443110.1016/j.wear.2022.204431 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0058107010.1007/BF00581070 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.02.05110.1016/j.matdes.2012.02.051 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10754510.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107545 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10833310.1016/j.triboint.2023.108333 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2407210.1002/pc.24072 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.012 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.triboint.2022.10820610.1016/j.triboint.2022.108206 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2927010.1002/pc.29270 ↗
14. 10.1021/am506726f10.1021/am506726f ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10829810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108298 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10703710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107037 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.triboint.2022.10801710.1016/j.triboint.2022.108017 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10603210.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106032 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl404610c10.1021/nl404610c ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14755110.1016/j.cej.2023.147551 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.9b2090210.1021/acsami.9b20902 ↗
22. 10.1016/0025-5408(86)90011-510.1016/0025-5408(86)90011-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.016 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.11.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.11.017 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0096510.1021/acsnano.5b00965 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.010 ↗
27. 10.1080/15583724.2017.130966210.1080/15583724.2017.1309662 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.001 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.053 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10672810.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106728 ↗
31. 10.1002/smll.20130364810.1002/smll.201303648 ↗
32. X.WangandZ.Ma “Antislip Rubber Sole Material ”2013CN Patent No. 104 710 658.
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11090410.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110904 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.19610.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.196 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.172379210.1063/1.1723792 ↗
36. 10.1177/0095244323120064710.1177/00952443231200647 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.09.01310.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.09.013 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.02.03410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.02.034 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2394610.1002/pc.23946 ↗
40. 10.5254/1.354767710.5254/1.3547677 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0125910.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01259 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.9b1201310.1021/acsami.9b12013 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.02410.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.024 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.490716910.1063/1.4907169 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00339-024-08143-w10.1007/s00339-024-08143-w ↗
46. 10.1016/j.physb.2023.41529010.1016/j.physb.2023.415290 ↗
47. 10.1007/s00339-021-05230-010.1007/s00339-021-05230-0 ↗
48. 10.1039/C4RA04682J10.1039/C4RA04682J ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10970510.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109705 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10660110.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106601 ↗
51. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0587810.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05878 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.04110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.041 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10818610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108186 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.035 ↗
55. 10.1007/978-3-642-29648-210.1007/978-3-642-29648-2 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.01510.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.015 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.03910.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.039 ↗
58. 10.1021/nn405938z10.1021/nn405938z ↗
59. 10.1021/ar500274q10.1021/ar500274q ↗
60. 10.1016/j.wear.2018.07.02710.1016/j.wear.2018.07.027 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11070010.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110700 ↗