Fatigue behavior and modeling of chopped carbon fiber reinforced sheet molding compound composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The quasi‐static and fatigue behavior of chopped carbon fiber reinforced sheet molding compound (SMC) composite was investigated. The microstructure of material was inspected by X‐ray Computerized Tomography (XCT) and the fiber orientation distribution was analyzed. Quasi‐static tensile test was performed on specimens with different gauge length to study the size effect on mechanical properties and digital image correlation system was applied to record the strain distribution. The fatigue behavior of material was evaluated under both tension‐tension (R = 0.1) and tension‐compression (R = −1) loadings, in which XCT scanned specimens were tested to characterize the microstructure at failure location. Interrupted fatigue test was performed to observe the damage evolution process on the side surface of specimen by optical microscope and the dominant fatigue failure modes were identified. A representative volume element based modeling methodology was modified and applied to establish the relationship between heterogenous microstructure and macroscopic mechanical behaviors. The simulation results show good consistency with experimental observations which demonstrates the effect of local fiber orientation on durability performance of material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Energy and Power Engineering Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China
Center for Key Light‐weight Materials Nanjing Tech University Nanjing China
Yangtze Delta Region Institute of Advanced Materials Suzhou China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. G.Kirupanantham Characterisation of discontinuous carbon fibre preforms for automotive applications (Doctoral dissertation University of Nottingham) 2013.
2. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-325-6.00001-310.1016/B978-1-78242-325-6.00001-3 ↗
3. 10.1177/073168440808888310.1177/0731684408088883 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199830934302810.1177/0021998309343028 ↗
5. 10.1177/002199831561312910.1177/0021998315613129 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.012 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11124510.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111245 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10552010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105520 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2476710.1002/pc.24767 ↗
11. L. M.Martulli L.Muyshondt M.Kerschbaum S.Pimenta S. V.Lomov Y.Swolfs Carbon fibre sheet moulding compounds with high in‐mould flow: Linking morphology to tensile and compressive properties.2019 126(June).10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105600 ↗
12. 10.1177/002199831880461210.1177/0021998318804612 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.016 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11228010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112280 ↗
15. Martulli L. M. · Int. J. Fatigue · 2019 · 134 · 2020
16. 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-310.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.06310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.063 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10573110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105731 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.038 ↗
20. Tamboura S. · Int. J. Fatigue · 2020 · 135 · 110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105526 ↗
21. Görthofer J. · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 174 · 2020
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.07910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.079 ↗
23. 10.1177/002199831665474810.1177/0021998316654748 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.007 ↗
26. 10.1177/002199831667272210.1177/0021998316672722 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.039 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.021 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.02.02410.1016/j.commatsci.2006.02.024 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.04510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.045 ↗
31. Pan Y. · J. Mech. Mater. Struct. · 2008 · 68 · 2792
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.003 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.041 ↗
34. 10.1122/1.54994510.1122/1.549945 ↗
35. Basquin O. H. · Proc. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. · 1910 · 10 · 625
36. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10664710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106647 ↗
37. 10.1111/ffe.1272110.1111/ffe.12721 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.004 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.009 ↗
40. DERAKANE® Epoxy Vinyl Ester Resins 411‐3502004.
41. Technical Data Sheet Vinylester Infusion Resin2016.
42. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.006 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.02.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.02.007 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0054166610.1007/BF00541666 ↗
45. S. T.Pinho Modelling failure of laminated composites using physically‐based failure models (Doctoral dissertation University of London) 2005.