journal article·2022-06

Erosive wear analysis of bamboo fiber‐reinforced high‐density polyethylene composites: Effect of aluminum oxide

Liangpeng Jiang, Yue Yang, Jingjing Fu, Wenxiang Teng, Hao Wang

Polymer Composites· Volume 43· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In order to improve the erosive wear resistance of bamboo fiber‐reinforced high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) composites, the effect of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) on the erosive wear behavior of composites was investigated. The study of erosive wear was using the swirling water jet technique. The results showed that the addition of nanoscale Al2O3 could optimize the structural strength, composite structure, and erosive wear resistance of composites. The best erosive wear resistance was observed in composites containing 6/189 wt% of nanoscale Al2O3, 80/189 wt% of bamboo fiber, 100/189 wt% of HDPE, and 3/189 wt% of maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene. The composites with and without adding nanoscale Al2O3, both exhibited a maximum erosive wear rate at a shooting distance of 0.5 cm and an erosive duration of 180 s. The erosive wear mechanism of composites mainly included pulverization of bamboo fibers, brittle fracture of HDPE matrix, and increasing in oxygen content.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Erosion and Abrasive Machining

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering Anhui University of Science and Technology Huainan China

Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Nanjing China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10610210.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106102 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10834710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108347 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11872310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118723 ↗
4. Pati P. R. · Eng. J‐J. Eng. · 2021 · 0 · 1
5. 10.1002/pc.2524610.1002/pc.25246 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12588-019-09257-010.1007/s12588-019-09257-0 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2307910.1002/pc.23079 ↗
8. 10.1177/152808371556937610.1177/1528083715569376 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.20510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.205 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.61310.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.613 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.003 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.4770910.1002/app.47709 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2509710.1002/pc.25097 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.10010.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.100 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.01410.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.triboint.2011.10.01210.1016/j.triboint.2011.10.012 ↗
17. Dwivedi U. K. · BioRes. · 2007 · 2 · 69310.15376/biores.2.4.693-698 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.39510.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.395 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.02110.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.021 ↗
20. 10.1002/adv.2171810.1002/adv.21718 ↗
21. Gupta A. · J. Surf. Eng. Mater. Adv. Technol. · 2012 · 2 · 21317
22. Gupta A. · Int. J. Surf. Eng. Interdiscipl. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 6 · 50
23. 10.1007/s12633-017-9637-710.1007/s12633-017-9637-7 ↗
24. Jiang L. · Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. · 2019 · 36 · 1625
25. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10131810.1016/j.jobe.2020.101318 ↗
26. Du P. · Chongqing Univ. · 2016
27. Qi R. · J. Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. · 2019 · 53 · 373
28. Song L. · J. F. Mater. · 2013 · 44 · 2451
29. 10.1002/app.5009410.1002/app.50094 ↗