Static and fatigue behavior of a carbon‐fiber SMC‐R composite under combined tensile and shear stresses
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Randomly oriented short fiber reinforced sheet molding compound composites (SMC‐R) are among the most commonly used composites for automotive and many non‐automotive structural applications. Many studies have reported the static and fatigue properties of SMC‐R composites under uniaxial stress conditions. However, there are many applications in which they may be subjected to biaxial stress conditions and their biaxial properties have not been reported in literature. The current study considers the static and fatigue characteristics of a randomly oriented carbon fiber SMC‐R under both uniaxial and biaxial loading conditions with various combinations of tensile and shear stresses. A butterfly shaped Arcan specimen was used to conduct the biaxial stress tests. Since both static strength and fatigue life data exhibited significant variability, statistical analysis was conducted using Weibull distribution to analyse the variations in these properties of the material. In biaxial conditions in which a shear stress is imposed along with a tensile stress, the tensile strength of the material decreases with increasing shear stress. A failure envelope drawn based on von Mises equation shows reasonable agreement with the experimental results. As a percentage of the static strength, the fatigue strengths at 1 million cycles in tension and combined equal tension and shear are significantly higher than the fatigue strength in pure shear.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Michigan‐Dearborn Dearborn Michigan USA
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Passenger Car Meeting & Exposition SAE Technical Paper 790671 1979 2283.
2. D. A.Reigner B. A.Sanders National Technical Conference Soc. Plast. Eng. 1979.
3. 10.1177/00219983830170040210.1177/002199838301700402 ↗
4. 10.1016/0010-4361(82)90171-910.1016/0010-4361(82)90171-9 ↗
5. 10.1177/00219983930270080310.1177/002199839302700803 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.75002010510.1002/pc.750020105 ↗
7. 10.1177/00219983830170020310.1177/002199838301700203 ↗
8. 10.1177/00219983830170030610.1177/002199838301700306 ↗
9. 10.2174/1874088X0140801010810.2174/1874088X01408010108 ↗
10. 10.1177/002199830934302810.1177/0021998309343028 ↗
11. 10.1177/073168440808888310.1177/0731684408088883 ↗
12. P.S.Stelzer T.Hebertinger V.Reisecker J.Maier.Proc American Soc for Composites 35th Technical Conference New York NY 2021
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10560010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105600 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10551010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105510 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.041 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831880461210.1177/0021998318804612 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10528910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105289 ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0232414610.1007/BF02324146 ↗
20. 10.1016/0015-0568(80)90041-X10.1016/0015-0568(80)90041-X ↗
21. R.MandapatiandP. K.Mallick Proc. 20th International Conference on Composite Mater July 19–24 2015.
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.03.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2010.03.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107141 ↗
24. R.Mandapati Study of Biaxial Fatigue Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Polymer under Tensile and Shear Loadings Ph.D. Dissertation Automotive Systems Engineering University of Michigan‐Dearborn Dearborn MI 2016
25. Kapur K. C. · 1977
26. Mallick P. K. · 2008
27. Hill R. · 1950