Effect of surface modification and fiber content on the mechanical performance of compression molded polyethylene‐maple composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract With the objective of producing more sustainable materials, wood‐plastic composites were produced using linear low density polyethylene and a wide range of maple wood fiber content (up to 80% wt). This was possible by using a simple dry‐blending of the component in a powder form and compression molding. In particular, the effect of different surface treatments (mercerization, maleated polyethylene [MAPE], and their combination) on the morphology and mechanical performance of these composites was studied. The results show that all the surface treatments investigated were able to improve the fiber‐matrix adhesion, leading to better composite homogeneity, and higher mechanical properties. Furthermore, it was possible to increase the amount of wood that can be introduced in the composites compared to untreated fibers. In our case, up to 80% wt of maple fibers were easily processed generating significant improvements in moduli (367%) and strength (50%), especially when a combination of alkali‐MAPE treatment was performed. This simple processing of the composites is interesting to produce different parts size and geometry with limited degradation since no melt compounding is performed. The work also represents a way to produce sustainable, economic, and lightweight composites with improved properties using a high content of renewable filler.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering and CERMA Université Laval Quebec Quebec Canada
Funding
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2174/157017941366616092909501710.2174/1570179413666160929095017 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.01710.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.017 ↗
3. Plastics – the Facts 2019 An analysis of European plastics production demand and waste data a study carried out by Plastics EPRO;2019www.plasticseurope.org/en/resources/market-data.
4. 10.1126/science.aaq032410.1126/science.aaq0324 ↗
5. 10.1126/sciadv.170078210.1126/sciadv.1700782 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.013 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.01710.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.017 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12649-020-00986-710.1007/s12649-020-00986-7 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11709-019-0568-910.1007/s11709-019-0568-9 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.aat907210.1126/science.aat9072 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40684-019-00018-310.1007/s40684-019-00018-3 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.043 ↗
15. 10.1155/2015/24394710.1155/2015/243947 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.025 ↗
17. 10.1177/073168441880202210.1177/0731684418802022 ↗
18. Muñoz‐Vélez M. F. · Polymer · 2018 · 10 · 1
19. 10.1007/s11029-014-9422-210.1007/s11029-014-9422-2 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2244210.1002/pc.22442 ↗
21. 10.1002/pen.2431410.1002/pen.24314 ↗
22. 10.1080/09276440.2016.114416310.1080/09276440.2016.1144163 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.03010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.030 ↗
24. Hanana F. E. · Polym. Polym. Compos. · 2020 · 1
25. A.RaymondandD.Rodrigue inProceedings of the 72nd Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition of the Society of Plastics Engineers Las Vegas Nevada USA 2014 2367.
26. 10.1002/pc.2356410.1002/pc.23564 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2245510.1002/pc.22455 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.65510.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.655 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10570-019-02429-610.1007/s10570-019-02429-6 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.02110.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.021 ↗
31. 10.1080/09276440.2016.118455610.1080/09276440.2016.1184556 ↗
32. A.VerdaguerandD.Rodrigue inProceedings of the 72nd Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition of the Society of Plastics Engineers Las Vegas Nevada USA 2014 2021.
33. 10.1177/073168440606667610.1177/0731684406066676 ↗
34. 10.1002/vnl.2032110.1002/vnl.20321 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11566210.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115662 ↗
36. 10.1002/pen.2116410.1002/pen.21164 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.017 ↗
38. 10.1177/02624893020210060110.1177/026248930202100601 ↗
39. 10.1177/002199831351425510.1177/0021998313514255 ↗
40. 10.3390/polym1203050310.3390/polym12030503 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.08810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.088 ↗
42. 10.1002/pen.2425310.1002/pen.24253 ↗
43. 10.1177/02624893130320040110.1177/026248931303200401 ↗
44. 10.1002/pc.2283410.1002/pc.22834 ↗
45. 10.1002/pc.2447310.1002/pc.24473 ↗
46. 10.1002/app.4380210.1002/app.43802 ↗
47. N.Ward‐PerronandD.Rodrigue inProceedings of the 70th Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition of the Society of Plastics Engineers Orlando Florida USA 2012 2263.
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.05610.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.056 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.02510.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.025 ↗
50. Ortega Z. · Mater. Manuf. Processes · 2013 · 28 · 879
51. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.017 ↗
52. 10.1002/app.3693510.1002/app.36935 ↗
53. 10.3390/ma1201009910.3390/ma12010099 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.02210.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.022 ↗