journal article·2012-01

Study on a parameter to express glass‐forming relationship of phenolic–novolac resin

Kai Guo, Xiufang Bian, Zhonghao Li, Jingyu Qin

Polymer Composites· Volume 33· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Chemoviscosity and glass‐forming ability of commercial phenolic–novolac resin are investigated at hexamethylenetramine (HMTA) curing agent content weight from 6 to 9%. We propose a parameter, Mk, which is based on chemoviscosity change rate and Tg0 of uncured liquid resin, to predict glass‐forming ability of the fully cured phenolic–novolac resin. It is found that Mk has a negative linear relationship with Tg∞, and the lower Mk represents the better glass‐forming ability of initial phenolic–novolac uncured liquid resin while the higher Tg∞ represents the better glass‐forming ability of fully cured resin. Further more, Mk establishes a kinetic glass‐forming relationship between liquid uncured and fully cured phenolic–novolac resin in terms of comparing with Tg∞. POLYM. COMPOS., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1515/hfsg.1988.42.1.5310.1515/hfsg.1988.42.1.53 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-3-662-04101-710.1007/978-3-662-04101-7 ↗
3. 10.1002/app.2745610.1002/app.27456 ↗
4. Turi E. · 1981 · 441
5. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.09.00410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.09.004 ↗
6. Gillham J. · Appl. Sci. · 1985 · 5 · 159
7. Sperling L. · 1992
8. 10.1002/pen.1044710.1002/pen.10447 ↗
9. Martin G.C. · Modeling the Structure‐Property‐Processing Relationships of Epoxy Resins During Cure, SPEANTEC. Tech. Papers. · 1989 · 35 · 1079
10. 10.1002/pen.76014031210.1002/pen.760140312 ↗
11. 10.1021/bk-1982-0227.ch01810.1021/bk-1982-0227.ch018 ↗
12. 10.1016/0032-3861(92)90384-910.1016/0032-3861(92)90384-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2006.06.00810.1016/j.cej.2006.06.008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tca.2008.03.00510.1016/j.tca.2008.03.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0014-3057(98)00226-210.1016/S0014-3057(98)00226-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.09.01910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.09.019 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tca.2009.01.00510.1016/j.tca.2009.01.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00030-810.1016/S0960-8524(97)00030-8 ↗
19. 10.1002/apmc.1984.05122011710.1002/apmc.1984.051220117 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2006.06.00810.1016/j.cej.2006.06.008 ↗
21. 10.1016/0022-3093(85)90334-510.1016/0022-3093(85)90334-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.06.02610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.06.026 ↗
23. Bian X.F. · Phys. Lett. A · 2005 · 61 · 335
24. 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.06.00610.1016/j.matchar.2007.06.006 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.09610.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.096 ↗
26. Sperling L.H. · 1992 · 544
27. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.06.00410.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.06.004 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tca.2009.09.01010.1016/j.tca.2009.09.010 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tca.2008.04.01210.1016/j.tca.2008.04.012 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.76029050610.1002/pen.760290506 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.09.03010.1016/j.matlet.2006.09.030 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.023 ↗