Evaluation of test methods in the determination of in‐plane shear modulus of poly(phenylene sulfide) matrix composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An investigation was conducted to evaluate the validity of various test methods in the dtermination of in‐plane shear moduli of semicrystalline, poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS) thermoplastic composites. Materials studied included composites based on an orginal, non‐optimized composite grade of PPS reinforced with carbon and glass fibers, and another based on the new improved, high‐ductility, rapid crystallizing, composite grade of PPS along with optimally sized glass fiber reinforcement. Specimens were prepared in a matched die mold, either as‐molded or annealed. It was found that shear test methods, such as ±45° in plane, Iosipescu, and 45° pff‐axis tension, are validfor shear modulus measurements of PPS composites if the material has no internal stress cracks. For example, there was no significant difference for in‐plane shear moduli determined from these three shear testsw for the improved, thoughened PPS composites. This was attributed to the thoughness and fast crystallization of the PPS composites. This was attributed to the thoughness and fast crystallization of the PPS matrix resin, and the strong fiber/maxtrix interface, however, the ±45° in‐place shear test should be used with caution for certain thermoplastic composites,. Becuase of the ±45° lay‐up, the annealed[±45]2s original PPS composite la, omates siffered jogj resodia; stresses and were observed to have stress‐related cracks. Consequently, the measured shear moduli are lower than the true values. Since we have demostrated that some shear tests amy not be appropriate for modulus measurements of certain composites, it is important to choose the proper test method for the shear characterization of thermoplastic composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Material Properties and Processing · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0010-4361(86)90729-910.1016/0010-4361(86)90729-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/0010-4361(79)90025-910.1016/0010-4361(79)90025-9 ↗
3. 10.1177/07316844870060040110.1177/073168448700600401 ↗
4. C. T.Herakovich H. W.Bergner andD. E.Bowles inTest methods and DEsign Allowables for Fibrous Composites ASTM STP 734 C. C.Chamis ed. ASTMPhiladelphia(1981).
5. L. J.Hart‐Smith 32nd SAMPLE symp. p349 Covina Calif. (1987).
6. ASTMD 3518‐76(82) ASTM Philadelphia(1982).
7. SACMA SRM 7‐88 Suppliers of Advanced Composite materials Assoc. Arlington Va.(1988).
8. ASTM Propsoed Method;Standard Test Method for Shear properties of Fiber‐resin Composites using a V‐notched Beam ASTM Philadephia(1990).
9. 10.1177/00219983870210060110.1177/002199838702100601 ↗
10. ASTMD 4255 83 ASTM Philadelphia(1083).
11. Pangano N. J. · J. Compos. Mater. · 1969 · 2 · 1810.1177/002199836800200102 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0231996210.1007/BF02319962 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0232632010.1007/BF02326320 ↗
14. ASTMD 2344‐84(89) ASTM Philadelphia(1989).
15. ASTMD 3846‐79(59) ASTM Philadelphia(1985).
16. Materials Science Corporation: “Results of Survey Questionnaire on STructural property Test Methods ” ASTM D 30 Meeting Minutes Philadelphia (Fall1990).
17. Barrett C. R. · 1973 · 196
18. J. D.Winkel J. R.Wareham R. L.Hagenson D. A.Soules andS. D.Mills 35th SAMPE Symp.p.1628 Covina Calif. (1990).
19. K. J.Spoo R. L.HagensonandD. A.Soules 36th SAMPE Symp.p.2082 Covina Calif. (1991).
20. W. W.Tseng S. K.Doun andA. Y.Lou 34th SAMPE Symp.p.1977 Covina Calif. (1989).
21. W. W.Tseng unpulished results Phillips Petroleum Co. Bartlesville Okla. (1989).
22. R. L.HagensonandA. Y.Lou unpulished results Phillips Petroleum Co. Bartlesville Okla. (1986).
23. Tsai S. W. · 1988
24. K. J.SchulteandH. T.Hahn Proc. Amer. Soc. Compos. 5th Conf. p.81 Amer. Soc. Compos. Dayton Ohio (1990).