journal article·2025-09-10Open access

Numerical data generation for building machine learning models for permeability estimation of fibrous structures

Tim Schmidt, Dinesh Krishna Natarajan, Miro Duhovic, Stefano Cassola, Marlon Nuske, David May

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue S1

Abstract

Abstract The challenge of developing effective multiscale flow simulation methods is to take into account all relevant physical effects from fiber to component level, but remain manageable in terms of computational effort. A challenge that can potentially be met by incorporating data‐driven machine learning methods in the multiscale approaches, for example, by substituting flow simulations at the microscale where the simulation domains have high geometric similarity. 4284 models of fibrous structures with several hundred individual fibers and varying structural parameters were generated for permeability estimation. Various neural network architectures were trained with this data and different input data strategies were compared concerning accuracy in the estimation of the direction‐dependent permeability tensor. The best case showed a mean relative error of 11.35%, with the inference time being orders of magnitude lower than the flow simulation computing time. Highlights Statistical volume elements essential for accurate permeability estimation. Large data set FiberStructurePerm generated and available on Zenodo. Permeability can be predicted well with data driven emulators. Time required to predict the permeability is reduced by over 90%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Leibniz‐Institut für Verbundwerkstoffe GmbH Kaiserslautern Germany

Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH Kaiserslautern Germany

Faserinstitut Bremen e.V. (FIBRE), Am Biologischen Garten 2 Bremen Germany

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Witten E · 2023
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.001 ↗
3. 10.1177/002199831877215210.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
4. 10.1177/073168441243862910.1177/0731684412438629 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.809.48710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.809.487 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2606410.1002/pc.26064 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00038-010.1016/S1359-835X(01)00038-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.07.00710.1016/j.probengmech.2005.07.007 ↗
9. On the size of representative volume element for Darcy law in random media
10. 10.1016/j.cma.2008.01.00810.1016/j.cma.2008.01.008 ↗
11. Darcy H · 1856
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.030 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.04510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.045 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10749910.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107499 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0137698910.1007/BF01376989 ↗
16. 10.1080/0262666650949340510.1080/02626666509493405 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10739710.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107397 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10648010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106480 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.09.00710.1016/j.advwatres.2017.09.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.gmod.2015.06.00310.1016/j.gmod.2015.06.003 ↗
22. 10.30423/userguide.geodict10.30423/userguide.geodict ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.75014061110.1002/pc.750140611 ↗
24. EngelfriedM MavoungouLA VerspohlI BöhlerP MiddendorfP.Generating representative volume elements of yarns with non‐circular filaments cross‐sections. In: FPCM 14 Lulea Sweden Jun. 2018.
25. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
26. 10.1177/002199831774795410.1177/0021998317747954 ↗
27. DittmannJ FriedrichsA NassenA FacciottoS MiddendorfP.Transient dual‐phase void prediction in microscopic yarn models with OpenFOAM. In: ICCM 22 Melbourne Jan. 2019.
28. DittmannJ MiddendorfP.Experimental validation of numerical dual‐scale permeability prediction. In: FPCM14 Lulea Sweden Jan. 2018.
29. 10.1177/002199831988461210.1177/0021998319884612 ↗
30. 10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-810.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
31. 10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
32. 10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗
33. KingmaDP BaJ.Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization; 2017. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980
34. RuderS.An Overview of Gradient Descent Optimization Algorithms; 2017. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1609.04747
35. 10.1007/s10596-019-09886-910.1007/s10596-019-09886-9 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10697310.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106973 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.12747310.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127473 ↗
38. 10.1063/5.006390410.1063/5.0063904 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10596-022-10184-010.1007/s10596-022-10184-0 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.10353910.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103539 ↗
41. 10.3389/fmats.2021.78650210.3389/fmats.2021.786502 ↗
42. 10.1515/pm-2001-38090710.1515/pm-2001-380907 ↗
43. 10.30423/userguide.geodict10.30423/userguide.geodict ↗
44. 10.30423/userguide.geodict10.30423/userguide.geodict ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10878110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108781 ↗
46. 10.1145/3292500.333070110.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
47. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
48. Maas AL · 2013
49. Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (ELUs)
50. KlambauerG UnterthinerT MayrA HochreiterS.Self‐normalizing neural networks. In: 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2017:972‐981.
51. 10.1007/978‐3‐642‐35289‐8_310.1007/978‐3‐642‐35289‐8_3 ↗
52. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting
53. Algorithms for hyper‐parameter optimization
54. 10.5281/ZENODO.1004709510.5281/ZENODO.10047095 ↗