Buckling analysis of hybrid fiber‐reinforced composite sandwich panels with varying numbers of polyurethane cores
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Hybrid fiber‐reinforced composite sandwich panels with multi‐layer polyurethane cores are widely applied in aerospace, automotive, construction, and shipbuilding industries. This study aims to investigate the buckling performance of composite structures with varying numbers of polyurethane cores. To achieve this, the buckling loads of these structures are determined using an energy method, microscopic mechanics method, and the first‐order zigzag kinematic model. The accuracy of the equation employed in the algorithm is validated using the finite element method. Additionally, we conduct a parametric analysis to examine the influence of various parameters on the buckling performance of the structures. The results indicate that an effective strategy for improving the critical buckling loads of the hybrid fiber‐reinforced composite sandwich plate involves strategically placing fibers and matrix materials with higher elastic modulus on the skin layer. Moreover, the critical buckling load is notably influenced by the number and positioning of polyurethane layers, as well as the fiber content. Highlights An analytical model is established to predict the buckling behavior. The correctness of the model was verified using the finite element method. Effects of structural parameters on buckling performance were investigated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aerospace Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an China
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Liaocheng University Liaocheng China
Technology department Wendeng Maxpower Tool Group Co., LTD Weihai China
Department of Electrical Engineering Technician College of Liaocheng City Liaocheng China
Technology department Shandong Liaocheng Zhongtai Watch Industry Co., LTD Liaocheng China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · Liaocheng University
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.043 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027 ↗
3. Experimental investigation of the compressive strength of hybrid composite sandwich beams with double‐corrugated sinusoidal core reinforced by graphene and polyurethane foam
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13392910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133929 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.021 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2554310.1002/pc.25543 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2008.03.00210.1016/j.tws.2008.03.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.07.00310.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.07.003 ↗
10. A new and simple HSDT for thermal stability analysis of FG sandwich plates
11. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10908410.1016/j.tws.2022.109084 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.aej.2017.06.00110.1016/j.aej.2017.06.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.04210.1016/j.aej.2020.11.042 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.aej.2022.07.03810.1016/j.aej.2022.07.038 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00466-017-1384-510.1007/s00466-017-1384-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.04.01210.1016/j.tws.2017.04.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.finel.2014.01.00410.1016/j.finel.2014.01.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.aej.2020.04.01210.1016/j.aej.2020.04.012 ↗
20. 10.1177/095440621875645110.1177/0954406218756451 ↗
21. 10.1088/2053-1591/aca88510.1088/2053-1591/aca885 ↗
22. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac97df10.1088/2053-1591/ac97df ↗
23. 10.12989/sem.2000.10.4.33710.12989/sem.2000.10.4.337 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00283-X10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00283-X ↗
25. 10.2514/1.J05239910.2514/1.J052399 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12206-014-0512-910.1007/s12206-014-0512-9 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.02310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.023 ↗
28. 10.1080/15376494.2018.144422810.1080/15376494.2018.1444228 ↗
29. 10.1177/0021998321103738810.1177/00219983211037388 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598-022-19930-x10.1038/s41598-022-19930-x ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.007 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.025 ↗
33. 10.1007/s13726-018-0622-910.1007/s13726-018-0622-9 ↗
34. 10.1007/s40430-021-03139-610.1007/s40430-021-03139-6 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.10100210.1016/j.jobe.2019.101002 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.012 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.035 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11650610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116506 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11157310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111573 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2713810.1002/pc.27138 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11243410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112434 ↗
42. Biaxial buckling analysis of SPS sandwich plate based on a simplified zig‐zag model