Viscoplastic deformation of cotton fabric‐reinforced polypropylene composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, cotton fabric‐reinforced polypropylene laminates (CFRLs) were prepared as an example to analyze the effect of viscoplastic deformation on the mechanical properties of natural fiber‐reinforced composites. Compared with neat polypropylene (PP), the tensile strength and modulus of CFRLs are significantly enhanced in all directions. However, CFRLs are more prone to plastic deformation than PP during static tensile tests. The tensile strength of CFRLs could be affected by the processing factors. As the drawing speed was reduced from 20 to 0.1 mm/min, the tensile strength of CFRLs decreased by 27%. Cyclic tensile tests were used to analyze the effect of viscoplastic deformation on the tensile strength of CFRLs, and the results showed that when the viscous deformation increased, the strain increased, leading to rapid fracture of CFRLs under cyclic tensile stress much lower than the tensile strength. By simulating the stress conditions of pressure vessels and pipes with different curved surfaces, CFRLs are shown to be more suitable for cylindrical curved structures, which has developable surface; While, they are not suitable for complex curved structures, such as spherical surfaces, that are undevelopable surface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangdong Polytechnic of Environmental Protection Engineering Foshan China
Engineering Research Center of Advanced Wooden Materials Ministry of Education Harbin China
College of Materials and Energy South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2285510.1002/pc.22855 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.05.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.05.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.08310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.083 ↗
6. 10.1002/adv.2132710.1002/adv.21327 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.01610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.016 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.05.03410.1016/j.tws.2017.05.034 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.05.05310.1016/j.polymer.2018.05.053 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2271710.1002/pc.22717 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.038 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.14310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.143 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.006 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2554010.1002/pc.25540 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11197610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111976 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2448610.1002/pc.24486 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2368710.1002/pc.23687 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2006310.1002/pc.20063 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.003 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2539910.1002/pc.25399 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.05.00510.1016/j.mechmat.2018.05.005 ↗
24. A.Zacharatos E.Kontou Nonlinear Viscoelastic Modeling of Soft Polymers Journal of Applied Polymer Science.2015 132(26) 42141.10.1002/app.42141 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.09210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.092 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.03410.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.034 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.01010.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.010 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.4672510.1002/app.46725 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10886110.1016/j.matdes.2020.108861 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.05.05710.1016/j.matdes.2011.05.057 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.046 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.004 ↗