Modeling of density of state for polyethylene–nanotubes nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract At the nanoscale system, the efficiency of carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforcement between the CNTs and polymer matrices in terms of interfacial load transferring is assessed for both nonfunctionalized and functionalized interfaces. The simulations of the mechanical properties (stress–strain) of polyethylene (PE)/CNT nanocomposites by the molecular dynamics are currently an area of discussion in the literature. In this work, PE considered as a thermoplastic material is studied, in which the characterization of its nanoscale load transfer has been carried out through the classification of representative nanoscale interface elements for nonfunctionalized CNTs for the diverse values of lengths and diameters. First, the main evaluations based on the density functional theory and the molecular dynamics method were used with the aim to examine the effect of PE monomers. Then, the effect of the diameter of CNTs with nonfunctionalization content on the electronic and mechanical properties of single‐walled carbon nanotubes was examined. The findings reveal that the density of states highlights the absence of orbital hybridization between the PE monomers and nanotubes, whereas the Mulliken charge analysis depicts that the PE polymer produces a positive charge that is directly proportional to the number of monomers with many chains of PE and different diameters of CNTs. The decrease in diameters implies an increase in nanocomposites stress. In addition, the results show that the reinforcements in the longitudinal direction are more promising than those in the transverse direction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanotechnology research and applications · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electronics Department, Faculty of electrical engineering University of Science and Technology Mohamed‐Boudiaf. El Mnaouar Oran Algeria
Physics Department, Sciences Faculty UHBB University Chlef Algeria
ST Department, Sciences and Technics Institute CUR University Relizane Algeria
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. YumengLi(2014) Multiscale Modeling of the Effects of Nanoscale Load Transfer on the Effective Elastic Properties of Carbon Nanotube‐Polymer Nanocomposites. PhD.TheseSept. 29 2014.Blacksburg Virginia.
2. 10.1007/s00894-013-1852-610.1007/s00894-013-1852-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.01810.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.018 ↗
4. Igor K. · Mod. Phys. Lett. B · 2016 · 30
5. Rossi M. · Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 69 · 1394
6. Rahmat M. · Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 72 · 72
7. 10.1021/jp044240310.1021/jp0442403 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp066077c10.1021/jp066077c ↗
9. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.01.02310.1016/j.commatsci.2012.01.023 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.02910.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.029 ↗
11. JunjieC L.Yanand all «Interfacial characteristics of carbon nanotube‐polymer composites»Volume114 November2018 Pages149–169.10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.021 ↗
12. Rafiee R. · Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part L · 2016 · 230 · 654
13. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.04110.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.041 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2442810.1002/pc.24428 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11199610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111996 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00339-020-03784-z10.1007/s00339-020-03784-z ↗
17. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.04.03810.1016/j.commatsci.2010.04.038 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp01559110.1021/jp015591 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.142811610.1063/1.1428116 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
21. Hessam Y. · Polym. Compos. · 2018 · 40
22. Material Studio 7.0 Accelrys Inc San Diego 2013
23. 10.1016/j.physb.2011.01.02010.1016/j.physb.2011.01.020 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.physe.2014.11.01710.1016/j.physe.2014.11.017 ↗
25. Valavala P. K. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 9 · 34
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.014 ↗
27. Gou J. · 2005
28. PreglerS.K. HuY. SinnottS.B. (2002) “Engineering the fiber‐matrix interface in carbon nanotube composites”. University of Florida CHE‐0200838
29. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00059-910.1016/S0266-3538(03)00059-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.05410.1016/j.msea.2006.10.054 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.024 ↗
32. M.BaadenDynamique moléculaire in silico complément de cours. CNRS UPR9080 2003.
33. A.MedianiEtude des propriétés physiques de polyoxyéthylène et de Poly(Ethylène Glycol) par dynamique moléculaire.Thèse de magistère. U.ST.0.2008.
34. 10.1016/S1089-3156(98)00042-710.1016/S1089-3156(98)00042-7 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.171210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1712 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.05.04510.1016/j.molstruc.2017.05.045 ↗
37. Gowrisankar P. A. · J. Nanomater. · 2013 · 201310.1155/2013/293936 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.physe.2012.12.01310.1016/j.physe.2012.12.013 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11224-011-9814-z10.1007/s11224-011-9814-z ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.029 ↗
41. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5008-4_610.1007/978-1-4020-5008-4_6 ↗
42. S.NamilaeDeformation mechanisms at atomic scale: role of defects in thermomechanical behavior of materials the Florida State University 2004.