A robust empirical model equation for the compaction response of textile reinforcements
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the empirical modeling of the compaction response of different fibrous reinforcements with a focus on natural fiber‐based textiles is investigated. The main objective is the improvement of an empirical modeling approach in terms of a constant high accuracy for different compaction behaviors and varying test conditions. Therefore, a new two‐parameter model function is derived based on the characteristics of the compaction work progression. Five different plant fiber textiles (flax and hemp) with different fiber architectures (nonwoven, woven, and unidirectional noncrimp fabric) and a woven glass fiber reinforcement are tested within compaction experiments, considering the variation of the stack height, the compaction rate and repetitive load‐unload cycles. The new empirical model shows an overall better accuracy with smaller deviations in quality compared to alternative, commonly used empirical model functions based on the power and exponential law, which are considered for comparison purposes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Processing of Composites Group, Department Polymer Engineering and Science Montanuniversität Leoben Leoben Austria
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1944702460865927910.1080/19447024608659279 ↗
2. Beil N. B. · Text. Res. J. · 2002 · 72 · 34110.1177/004051750207200411 ↗
3. Beil N. B. · Text. Res. J. · 2002 · 72 · 37510.1177/004051750207200501 ↗
4. 10.1177/00405175890590050510.1177/004051758905900505 ↗
5. Dunlop J. I. · J. Text. Inst. · 1983 · 74 · 9210.1080/00405008308631770 ↗
6. Chen B. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 60 · 222310.1016/S0266-3538(00)00017-8 ↗
7. Jong S. · Text. Res. J. · 1986 · 56 · 75910.1177/004051758605601208 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199831667157210.1177/0021998316671572 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.019 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.1009110.1002/pc.10091 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.1012810.1002/pc.10128 ↗
12. Francucci G. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2011 · 37 · 478910.1002/app.35543 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-3-319-07944-8_410.1007/978-3-319-07944-8_4 ↗
14. Madsen B. · 2004
15. Matsudaira M. · J. Text. Inst. · 1995 · 86 · 47610.1080/00405009508658774 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.002 ↗
17. 10.1080/00405000.2010.51510310.1080/00405000.2010.515103 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01175-310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01175-3 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10853-015-8860-010.1007/s10853-015-8860-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00318-410.1016/S0266-3538(02)00318-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.017 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.04010.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.040 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.008 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00148-210.1016/S1359-835X(00)00148-2 ↗
26. May D. · Adv. Manufact.: Polym. Compos. Sci. · 2019 · 5 · 230