Direct measurement and verification of cohesive zone model parameters for basalt/PP rods using the transverse tensile test and virtual double cantilever beam test
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To further our understanding of failure in thermoplastic‐based composite rods, the mode I‐governed cohesive zone model parameter of a basalt fiber reinforced polypropylene composite rod is evaluated. The relations between stress and strain, the maximum normal traction and final separation displacement are examined using a transverse tensile test method. The measured traction is verified by three‐dimensional finite element analysis of rod‐shaped double cantilever beam specimens. The numerical results show the close relation between the crack length and cube root of compliance, and yields a representative value of the mode I‐governed critical fracture energy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Center for Structural Materials, Polymer Matrix Hybrid Composite Materials Group National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) Ibaraki Japan
Department of Aerospace Engineering Tohoku University Sendai Japan
Funding
Japan Science and Technology Agency
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.011 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym1110166710.3390/polym11101667 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1306136210.3390/ma13061362 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1309140210.3390/polym13091402 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.080 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2663310.1002/pc.26633 ↗
7. 10.3934/matersci.2016.4.156110.3934/matersci.2016.4.1561 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2567010.1002/pc.25670 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2664110.1002/pc.26641 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000324310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003243 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2651610.1002/pc.26516 ↗
12. 10.1177/089270571142865910.1177/0892705711428659 ↗
13. Maddah H. A. · Am. J. Polym. Sci. · 2016 · 6 · 1
14. 10.1002/pen.2609310.1002/pen.26093 ↗
15. Poornima C. · Polym. Compos. · 2022 · 1
16. 10.2208/jscejseee.73.II_110.2208/jscejseee.73.II_1 ↗
17. 10.3390/polym1318313610.3390/polym13183136 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.04410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.044 ↗
19. Zhao Y. · Adv. Civil Eng. · 2019 · 2019 · 563080510.1155/2019/5630805 ↗
20. 10.1051/matecconf/20192650100810.1051/matecconf/201926501008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12010810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120108 ↗
22. 10.1186/s40069-021-00472-x10.1186/s40069-021-00472-x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.06310.1016/j.msea.2008.11.063 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
26. 10.1115/1.317306410.1115/1.3173064 ↗
27. 10.1002/nme.9310.1002/nme.93 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00122-X10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00122-X ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.001 ↗
30. 10.1243/03093247V24420710.1243/03093247V244207 ↗
31. Carlsson L. A. · 2014 · 25010.1201/b16618 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.007 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10704-021-00556-510.1007/s10704-021-00556-5 ↗
34. Jones R. · 2018 · 763
35. 10.1002/pc.2691910.1002/pc.26919 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11477810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114778 ↗
37. Material model – Bilinear Behavior 4.12.1.2. ANSYS Mechanical APDL Theory Reference release 18.2
38. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10317210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103172 ↗