journal article·2013-11

Simplified cohesive zone analysis of mixed‐mode I–II delamination in composite beams

A.B. de Morais

Polymer Composites· Volume 34· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

A simplified Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) was developed for the analysis of mixed‐mode I–II delamination in composite beams. The present model applies to unidirectional laminates with half‐thickness delaminations. Besides its beam theory basis, the present CZM differs from the common formulation in the piecewise linear softening and in the definition of dissipated energy adopted. Moreover, the consistency condition needed to ensure accurate results is embedded in the model developed. In this article, the analysis focused on the Moment‐Loaded Cantilever Beam (MLCB) specimen for which an exact J‐integral based analytical solution exists. The present results agreed with the latter solution despite some features that have been recently reported to compromise the accuracy of CZM, that is, nonlinearity of the whole softening process, local mode‐mix variations along the cohesive zone and large cohesive zones. POLYM. COMPOS., 34:1901–1911, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Aveiro, Campus Santiago 3810‐193 Aveiro Portugal

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. ISO 15024 · 2001
2. ASTM Committee D‐30 · 2010
3. ASTM D6671/D6671M–06
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.08.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2009.08.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.finel.2012.01.00610.1016/j.finel.2012.01.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.011 ↗
7. 10.1177/002199830303450510.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
8. Abaqus v6.11 · 2011
9. 10.1007/s10704-005-4729-610.1007/s10704-005-4729-6 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.05.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.05.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.01.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2010.01.012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.025 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.02210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.022 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2006.09.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.005 ↗
24. 10.1177/002199831038626010.1177/0021998310386260 ↗
25. Reeder J.R. · 2006
26. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-410.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-4 ↗
27. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90096-L10.1016/0266-3538(92)90096-L ↗
28. 10.1016/S0022-5096(03)00121-210.1016/S0022-5096(03)00121-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00096-110.1016/S0013-7944(03)00096-1 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10704-005-2181-210.1007/s10704-005-2181-2 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.01910.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.019 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.019 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0001779010.1007/BF00017790 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.030 ↗