journal article·2021-01

Comparing fiber orientation evolution between startup of shear and nonlubricated squeeze flow

Gregory M. Lambert, Peter Wapperom, Donald Baird

Polymer Composites· Volume 42· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Light weighting has become an integral part of vehicle design. This strategy makes use of fiber‐reinforced thermoplastics, which can be injection molded into complex shapes. Composite design work requires knowledge of the orientation state throughout a part to predict properties like stiffness and strength. Although evolution models for the orientation state have been developed, each requires empirical parameters, and no standard method for obtaining these exists. This work continues efforts to find such a test, particularly for long (average length > 1 mm) glass fiber composites. Here, a polypropylene loaded with 30, 40, and, 50 wt% long glass fiber is subjected to startup of shear and nonlubricated squeeze flow (NLSF). The orientation evolution was reported for both flows and an attempt was made at fitting several orientation models to the data. The measured orientation evolution from startup of shear was slower than expected, and this slower evolution appears to result from the combination of the initial orientation state and fiber concentration. On the other hand, the measured orientation profile from NLSF was found to be essentially independent of fiber concentration. However, the NLSF orientation profile could not be replicated with a single set of parameters. Rather, shear‐like parameters made reasonable predictions in shear‐dominated regions, and extension‐like parameters made reasonable predictions in extension‐dominated areas, in concordance with results from short glass fiber composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA

Macromolecules Innovation Institute Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA

Department of Mathematics Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Carlson L. A. · 1991
2. Hyer M. W. · 2009
3. 10.1098/rspa.1922.007810.1098/rspa.1922.0078 ↗
4. 10.1177/07316844840030020110.1177/073168448400300201 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.08.00210.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.08.002 ↗
6. Wang J. · J. Rheol. · 2008 · 52 · 5
7. Tseng H.‐C. · J. Rheol. · 2013 · 57 · 6
8. Foss P. H. · Polym. Compos. · 2014 · 35 · 4
9. 10.1122/1.493909810.1122/1.4939098 ↗
10. Tseng H.‐C. · J. Rheol. · 2018 · 62 · 110.1122/1.5009188 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00397-007-0194-710.1007/s00397-007-0194-7 ↗
12. 10.1122/1.471749610.1122/1.4717496 ↗
13. Eberle A. P. R. · J. Rheol. · 2009 · 53 · 3
14. Mazahir S. M. · Compos. A · 2013 · 51 · 10811710.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.008 ↗
15. Ortman K. · Polym. Compos. · 2012 · 33 · 810.1002/pc.22262 ↗
16. Meyer K. J. · Compos. A · 2014 · 62 · 778610.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.013 ↗
17. Lambert G. M. · J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. · 2017 · 139 · 310.1115/1.4034664 ↗
18. Lambert G. · Phys. Fluids · 2017 · 29 · 1210.1063/1.4998546 ↗
19. Chen H. · J. Rheol. · 2019 · 63 · 310.1122/1.5086805 ↗
20. V.Kunc B. J.Frame B. N.Nguyen C. L.TuckerIIIandG.Velez‐GarciaFiber length distribution measurement for long glass and carbon fiber reinforced injection molded thermoplastics. Paper presented at 7th annual society of plastic engineers automotive composites conference and exposition Troy MI;2007.
21. 10.1122/1.493822910.1122/1.4938229 ↗
22. N.Agarwal.Transient shear flow rheology of concentrated long glass fiber suspensions in a sliding plate rheometer. Paper presented at M.S. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksbirg VA 2009.
23. Hine P. J. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 1995 · 53 · 2
24. G.Velez‐Garcia.Experimental Evaluation and Simulations of Fiber Orientation in Injection Molding of Polymers containing Short Glass Fibers. Ph.D. Thesis Virginia Tech 2012.
25. Vélez‐García G. M. · Compos. A · 2012 · 43 · 110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.013 ↗
26. 10.1002/pen.76032040410.1002/pen.760320404 ↗
27. 10.1122/1.54994510.1122/1.549945 ↗
28. Huynh H. M. · 2001
29. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.10.00310.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.10.003 ↗
30. Hughes T. J. R. · Comput. Method Appl. M. · 1981 · 29 · 32910.1016/0045-7825(81)90049-9 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.12.00810.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.12.008 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.10.01210.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.10.012 ↗
33. 10.1122/1.300073210.1122/1.3000732 ↗
34. Natale G. · J. Rheol. · 2016 · 60 · 610.1122/1.4958666 ↗
35. Le Corre S. · J. Rheol. · 2005 · 49 · 510.1122/1.1993594 ↗
36. Servais C. · J. Rheol. · 1999 · 43 · 4