journal article·2020-05

Simulation of stochastic flow considering mesoscale permeability variability during the resin transfer molding process

Longfei He, Shilin Yan, Yongjing Li, Pin Wen, Xiangyu Xie, Wenchao Liu

Polymer Composites· Volume 41· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a method to obtain the random permeability field of the single‐layer woven fabric. Specifically, a unit cell model based on actual geometric characteristics of a single‐layer fiber reinforcement is established in the open‐source software TexGen. The local permeability value is retrieved from flow analysis in the software ANSYS/CFX based on TexGen voxel models. Probability distribution of reinforcement permeability is determined from the image analysis. Then, continuous random fields describing the local permeability in the fiber reinforcement are generated based on the Karhunen‐Loève (K‐L) expansion method, and suitable dimension‐reducing techniques are employed to represent all the random fields in the physical system. Furthermore, influences of the selected correlation lengths on the random field are explored. Finally, it is demonstrated in the flow numerical simulation that the stochastic flow model indeed more qualitatively and quantitatively agrees with the radial injection experiment than the traditional basic model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Material Mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hubei Key Laboratory of Theory and Application of Advanced Materials Mechanics Wuhan University of Technology Wuhan China

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Gutowski T. G. · 1997
2. 10.1177/00219983980320030210.1177/002199839803200302 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12289-012-1111-x10.1007/s12289-012-1111-x ↗
4. 10.1177/07316844940130030610.1177/073168449401300306 ↗
5. 10.1177/002199831037611010.1177/0021998310376110 ↗
6. A.Koorevaar Controlled Vacuum Infusion (CVI) Technology 2009 http://www.polyworx.com/pwx/cvi/.
7. 10.1002/pc.75011061310.1002/pc.750110613 ↗
8. P.Simacek S. G.Advani Resin flow simulations in liquid composite moulding processes: Recent advances and future directions. 17th International Conference on Composite Materials 2009 1–10.
9. Carman P. C. · Chem. Eng. Res. Des. · 1937 · 15 · 150
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00037-310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00037-3 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.1022110.1002/pc.10221 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.015 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00038-010.1016/S1359-835X(01)00038-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.011 ↗
16. B.Verleye M.Klitz R.Croce M.Griebel S. V.Lomov D.Roose I.Verpoest Predicting the permeability of textile reinforcements via a hybrid navier‐stokes/brinkman solver 8th International Conference on Flow Process Composite Materials July2006.
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.027 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.030 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.010 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0017-9310(98)00377-910.1016/S0017-9310(98)00377-9 ↗
21. Sozer E. M. · Int. SAMPE Tech. Conf. Ser. · 2001 · 176
22. F.Desplentere S.Lomov I.Verpoest Mold filling simulations for RTM: Influence of the scatter of preform permeability The 7th International Conference on Flow Processes in Composite Materials 2004 405–410.
23. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00035-010.1016/S1359-835X(02)00035-0 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:100654410732410.1023/A:1006544107324 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.03810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.038 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.03510.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.035 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.010 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.1047410.1002/pc.10474 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199830935588810.1177/0021998309355888 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.11.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2003.11.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.027 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.10.01310.1016/j.compfluid.2007.10.013 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.024 ↗
34. 10.1177/004051751141856210.1177/0040517511418562 ↗
35. M.Sherburn Geometric and mechanical modelling of textiles PhD Thesis University of Nottingham2007.
36. 10.1109/TIT.1968.105417410.1109/TIT.1968.1054174 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2097110.1002/pc.20971 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.013 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.021 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.05.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.05.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.024 ↗
42. N. C.Correia F.Robitaille A. C.Long et al. Variability in liquid composite molding techniques: process analysis and control 7th Flow Process in Composite Materials 2004 241–246.
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.09.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2004.09.002 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80037-310.1016/S0278-6125(06)80037-3 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.006 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.006 ↗