Kriging‐based orthotropic closure for flow‐induced fiber orientation and the part stiffness predictions with experimental investigation
Source abstract
Abstract
This study employs a new Kriging‐based orthotropic closure (KRI) and several current closures to solve the second‐order orientation tensor equation of motion, and the differences between closures and orientation distribution function calculation (DFC) are firstly compared by a new developed error metric. The mechanical properties of an injection molded short fiber reinforced composite directly depend on the orientation of fibers, the Halpin–Tsai and Tandon–Weng mechanical models are considered to evaluate the accuracy of the closures on stiffness predictions, quantitative comparisons between the numerical simulations and the experimental result are carried out for 30% weight fractions of short carbon fiber/poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) matrix composite. It is observed that the result of sequential KRI closure is in good agreement with the experimental data. The KRI closure is shown to be far more accurate than Hybrid closure and also performs better than orthotropic and natural closures. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:3844–3856, 2019. © 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Textile and Material Engineering Dalian Polytechnic University Dalian People's Republic of China
State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis of Industrial Equipment Dalian University of Technology Dalian People's Republic of China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pen.2172510.1002/pen.21725 ↗
2. 10.1177/073168441140022710.1177/0731684411400227 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.002 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.024 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.015 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.12.00810.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.12.008 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.004 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.013 ↗
10. 10.1098/rspa.1922.007810.1098/rspa.1922.0078 ↗
11. 10.1177/07316844840030020110.1177/073168448400300201 ↗
12. 10.1122/1.54994510.1122/1.549945 ↗
13. Doi M. · J. Polym. Sci. · 1981 · 19 · 229
14. 10.1017/S002211206200047610.1017/S0022112062000476 ↗
15. 10.1122/1.55063010.1122/1.550630 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.1056610.1002/pc.10566 ↗
17. Dupret F. · 1997
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.016 ↗
19. Zhao J. · Polym. Compos.
20. 10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.75005041310.1002/pc.750050413 ↗
22. 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-310.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 ↗
23. Bird R.B. · 1987
24. 10.1080/0305215X.2013.82767210.1080/0305215X.2013.827672 ↗
25. ASTM · 2010
26. ASTM D256‐10 Standard Test Method for Determining Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics ASTM New York (2010).
27. 10.1007/s00170-014-5874-810.1007/s00170-014-5874-8 ↗