Particle swarm and simulated annealing based intuitive search optimization of flexural behaviors in bioparticles impregnated coir fiber–vinyl ester composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The present investigation is focused on evaluation and optimization of flexural behaviors of bio‐particulates impregnated coir–vinyl ester composites. The bio‐particulates such as termite mound soil, groundnut and rice husk were selected and the composite fabrications were planned as per Design of Experiments with the different levels of fiber length, fiber content, and particulate content. The flexural strength of fabricated composites was evaluated as per ASTM D 790‐10. The fractography study was carried out on tested specimens using Scanning Electron Micrographs. The nonlinear regression models were developed for the prediction of flexural behaviors over the specified range of conditions. The fabrication parameters for the better value of flexural behaviors were determined using particle swarm and simulated annealing algorithms. The optimum conditions are further refined and validated experimentally using intuitive search algorithm. It was confirmed that the termite mound soil, ground nut and rice husk impregnated coir–vinyl ester composites exhibited better value of flexural strengths of 33.5 MPa, 36 MPa, and 38.4 MPa, respectively. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:1765–1774, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Sri Aravindar Engineering College Sedarapet 605 111 Tamilnadu India
Department of Mechanical Engineering A.C. College of Engineering and Technology Karaikudi 630 004 Tamilnadu India
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Mallick P.K. · 1993
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.01810.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.018 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170-010-2969-810.1007/s00170-010-2969-8 ↗
4. 10.1177/095440541141126710.1177/0954405411411267 ↗
5. Sathiyamurthy S. · Ind. J. Eng. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 20 · 59
6. Sathiyamurthy S. · Ind. J. Fibre Text. Res. · 2013 · 38 · 81
7. 10.1080/15376494.2012.69959910.1080/15376494.2012.699599 ↗
8. Veleumani S. · Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. · 2013 · 14 · 1
9. Balaji N.S. · Inst. Mech. Eng., Part E: J. Process. Mech. Eng.
10. 10.1007/s12666-013-0255-910.1007/s12666-013-0255-9 ↗
11. Deb K. · 2004
12. Sathiyamurthy S. · Manuf. Technol. Today · 2011 · 10 · 20
13. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.00410.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.02210.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.022 ↗
15. Kalyana Sundaram S. · Proc. IMechE Part L: J. Mater. Design Appl.
16. Bharathiraja G. · APRN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. · 2014 · 9 · 487
17. 10.1007/s12666-014-0423-610.1007/s12666-014-0423-6 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2324210.1002/pc.23242 ↗
19. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.18510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.185 ↗
20. 10.1080/0020716950880439710.1080/00207169508804397 ↗
21. Clerc M. · Proc. Congress Evol Comput. · 1999 · 43 · 1951
22. Monalisa and M. · Int. J. Parallel Emergent Distribution Syst.