An acoustic emission study on the fracture behavior of continuous glass fiber/polypropylene composites based on commingled yarn
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The fracture behavior of continuous glass fiber reinforced polypropylene composites made of commingled yarn in the form of biaxial (±±45°) noncrimp warp‐knitted fabric, twill woven fabric, and swirl mat, respectively, was investigated by virtue of single edge notched tensile (SEN‐T) specimens. These composite laminates were manufactured by compression molding and cooled at two different rates (1°C/min and 10°C/min) during the last processing phase of the laminates. The failure mechanisms were studied by acoustic emission (AE) analysis. AE amplitude ranges corresponding to the individual failure modes have been identified. For biaxial noncrimp fabric reinforced materials, the failure mechanisms involved in the fracture procedure are governed by the interface related failure events. Higher cooling rate, which is accompanied by better fiber/matrix adhesion, results in not only the increase in the relative proportion of high‐amplitude failure events, but also the occurrence of a large quantity of fiber fracture events. For woven fabric and mat reinforced composites, fiber‐dominated failure mechanisms result in the higher fracture toughness when compared with biaxial noncrimp fabric composites. Under this circumstance, the change in cooling rate only results in the difference in the relative frequency of the individual failure modes. In addition, it is found out that the initiation fracture toughness of SEN‐T specimens can be easily assessed by marking the load value which corresponds to the first point of AE signals emitted stably in AE events‐displacement curves. POLYM. COMPOS., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00396-610.1016/S0020-7683(00)00396-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00148-210.1016/S0266-3538(00)00148-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0963-8695(03)00004-510.1016/S0963-8695(03)00004-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00059-210.1016/S0266-3538(00)00059-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00160-910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00160-9 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00042-610.1016/S1359-835X(98)00042-6 ↗
7. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00068-210.1016/0266-3538(95)00068-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90171-610.1016/0266-3538(94)90171-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00087-810.1016/S0266-3538(02)00087-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00060-910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00060-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00156-110.1016/S1359-835X(00)00156-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.012 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.010 ↗
15. Lariviere D. · Adv. Compos. Lett. · 2003 · 12 · 19110.1177/096369350301200502 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2005210.1002/pc.20052 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2005310.1002/pc.20053 ↗
18. Wang Y.T. · Polym. Compos.
19. Wang Y.T. · Polym. Compos.
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.016 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00059-810.1016/S0266-3538(01)00059-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00011-610.1016/S0266-3538(98)00011-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00255-510.1016/S0266-3538(02)00255-5 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.1010310.1002/pc.10103 ↗