Modeling of the compression behavior of foam cores reinforced with composite rods
Source abstract
Abstract
This article models the energy‐absorbing characteristics of polymer foams reinforced with either carbon or glass fiber reinforced epoxy rods. Initially, the compression response of 20 mm thick foams containing rods of equal length was modeled and the resulting predictions were compared with experimental data. The FE models have been shown to accurately predict the load–displacement responses of the reinforced foams in most cases. It has been shown that the energy absorbed by the reinforced cores increases linearly with foam density and that it also increases with increasing rod diameter. The energy values were normalized by the mass of the reinforced core to determine specific energy absorption (SEA) values. It has been shown that the SEA increases rapidly with increasing rod diameter and more slowly with increasing foam density. The validated models were used to predict the compression response of foams of different thickness, where it was shown that increasing the thickness of the core results in a reduction in the SEA. In addition, the FE model was used to model graded cores based on composite rods of different lengths. Using differently sized rods allows for the controlled energy absorption as well as the more gradual increase in the sustained crushing load. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:2301–2311, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Materials and Structures, School of Engineering University of Liverpool, L69 3GH Liverpool UK
School of Architecture and Environment Sichuan University Chengdu 610065 People's Republic of China
Aerospace Research and Innovation Center (ARIC), Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research (KUSTAR) Abu Dhabi UAE
Funding
Chinese Government Award for Outstanding Students Abroad
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00219983920260120310.1177/002199839202601203 ↗
2. 10.1177/002199830203600716410.1177/0021998302036007164 ↗
3. D.D.Le Evaluation of Lightweight Material Concepts for Aircraft Turbine Engine Rotor Failure Protection Federal Aviation Administration Report No. DOT/FAA/AR‐96/110 (1997).
4. A.A.Shockey J.H.Giovanola J.W.Simons D.C.Erlich R.W.Klopp andS.R.Skaggs Advanced Armor Technology: Application Potential for Engine Fragment Barriers for Commercial Aircraft Federal Aviation Administration Report No. DOT/FAA/AR‐97/53 (1997).
5. Evaluation of a Composite Sandwich Fuselage Side Panel with Damage and Subjected to Internal Pressure
6. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00273-210.1016/S0266-3538(03)00273-2 ↗
7. 10.1177/00219983820160060610.1177/002199838201600606 ↗
8. 10.1177/00219983790130030810.1177/002199837901300308 ↗
9. 10.1177/00219983860200040610.1177/002199838602000406 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.025 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.322593710.1115/1.3225937 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.027 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.01010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.11.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.11.001 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219983730070040410.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
20. ABAQUS Theory Manual Version 6.11 Pawtucket Hibbitt Karlsson & Sorensen Inc. (2012).
21. C.F.Yen “Ballistic impact modeling of composite materials ” Vol.6inProceedings of the 7th international LS‐DYNA Users Conference Dearborn Michigan 15(2002).