journal article·2015-04Open access

Influence on the delamination phenomenon of matrix type and thermal variations in unidirectional carbon‐fiber epoxy composites

Patricia Coronado, Antonio Argüelles, Jaime Viña, Jorge Bonhomme, Victoria Mollón

Polymer Composites· Volume 36· Issue 4

Abstract

This article analyzes the influence of temperature on the delamination phenomenon in two composites with the same carbon‐fiber reinforcement, but different epoxy matrices. Interlaminar crack initiation and propagation under Mode I with static and fatigue loading are experimentally assessed for different test temperatures: 20, 50, and 90°C. The materials under study are made of AS4 unidirectional carbon fibers and different matrices: one is made of a 3501‐6 epoxy matrix (AS4/3501‐6), whereas the other is made of an 8552 epoxy matrix modified to increase its toughness (AS4/8552). Both composites have a symmetric laminate configuration [0°]16s. In the experimental program, double cantilever beam specimens were tested under static and fatigue loading. A fractographic study was also performed using a scanning electron microscope on samples obtained from specimens previously tested under static and fatigue loading. A comparison was made of the fracture surfaces at the different test temperatures and the experimental tests' results obtained. POLYM. COMPOS., 36:747–755, 2015. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Construction and Manufacturing Engineering University of Oviedo Campus de Gijón 33203 Gijón Spain

Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering University of Oviedo Campus de Gijón 33203 Gijón Spain

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness · Regional Government of Asturias

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00102-410.1016/S0266-3538(97)00102-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00025-610.1016/S0266-3538(98)00025-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.04.00610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.04.006 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2085510.1002/pc.20855 ↗
6. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00005-410.1016/0266-3538(95)00005-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00222-410.1016/S0266-3538(97)00222-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00071-810.1016/S0142-1123(01)00071-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.018 ↗
10. ASTM D 5528‐01 · 2001
11. ASTM D 6115‐97 · 1997
12. ASTM D 5229/D5229M‐92 · 2010
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.011 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1747‐1567.2011.00793.x10.1111/j.1747‐1567.2011.00793.x ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.1998.tb00582.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.1998.tb00582.x ↗
16. Greenhalgh E.S. · 2008
17. Smith B.W. · 1987
18. 10.1016/0010-4361(86)90746-910.1016/0010-4361(86)90746-9 ↗
19. M.F.HibbsandW.L.Bradley Correlations Between Micromechanical Failure Process and the Delamination Toughness of Graphite/Epoxy Systems J.E.MastersandJ.J.Au Eds. ASTM STP 948 (1987).10.1520/STP25615S ↗