The effect of temperature and loading rate on the mode II interlaminar fracture properties of a carbon fiber reinforced phenolic
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The combined effect of varying loading rate and test temperature on the mode II Interlaminar fracture properties of a carbon fiber reinforced phenolic resin has been investigated. End notch flexure tests at room temperature have shown that this composite offers a relatively modest value of GIIcNL at non‐linearity and that its interlaminar fracture toughness decreases with increasing loading rate. As the test temperature is increased, the quasistatic value of GIIcNL increases steadily and the reduction in GIIcNL with loading rate becomes less dramatic. At temperatures approaching the glass transition temperature of the phenolic matrix, the interlaminar fracture toughness of the composite begins to increase sharply with crosshead displacement rate. A more detailed understanding of the effect of varying the test conditions on the failure mechanisms occurring at the crack tip of these interlaminar fracture specimens has been achieved using the double end notch flexure (DENF) geometry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Dorey G. · 1984
2. 10.1016/0263-8223(89)90069-X10.1016/0263-8223(89)90069-X ↗
3. 10.1016/0266-3538(86)90039-410.1016/0266-3538(86)90039-4 ↗
4. R.Olsson Research report FFA TN 1992‐33 The Aeronautical Research Inst of Sweden (1992).
5. 10.1115/1.311950010.1115/1.3119500 ↗
6. 10.1016/0961-9526(92)90009-U10.1016/0961-9526(92)90009-U ↗
7. 10.1016/0961-9526(91)90010-P10.1016/0961-9526(91)90010-P ↗
8. Greszczuk L. B. · 1982 · 55
9. Masters J. E. · 1987 · 3.96
10. Chapman T. J. · 1987 · 3.295
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90033-910.1016/0266-3538(87)90033-9 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.141-143.47710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.141-143.477 ↗
13. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00005-410.1016/0266-3538(95)00005-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00047-X10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00047-X ↗
15. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00222-410.1016/S0266-3538(97)00222-4 ↗
16. 10.1177/00219983900240090210.1177/002199839002400902 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00084-X10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00084-X ↗
18. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)93669-B10.1016/0010-4361(95)93669-B ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0115412510.1007/BF01154125 ↗
20. Chai H. · Int. J. of Fracture · 1988 · 37 · 13710.1007/BF00041716 ↗
21. B.SmithandR.Grove U.S. Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories Report AFWAL‐TR‐87‐4001(1986).
22. D. S.Matsumoto B. J.McKinley M. L.Todt andS. K.Gifford General Electric Research Report No. 89CRD104(1989).
23. 10.1177/00219983970310140110.1177/002199839703101401 ↗