journal article·2016-04

Regeneration efficiency of composites containing two‐sized capillaries

Teresa Gumula, Piotr Szatkowski

Polymer Composites· Volume 37· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of this work is to develop a composite material containing a regeneration system and to demonstrate its self‐healing properties. For this purpose, we will study the self‐healing behavior of composites that are fabricated with a regeneration system consisting of two‐sized capillaries filled with epoxy resin and hardener. Composites with restorative systems containing identical microtube diameters can be found in the literature, but until now no comparative studies with multiple diameter structures have been published. We will prove that a regeneration system containing two types of capillaries with diameters of 100 and 50 μm is more efficient (68% recovery of bending strength and Young's modulus after third regeneration) than a regeneration system containing capillaries with the same diameter (44% recovery of bending strength and 44% recovery of Young's modulus after third regeneration). POLYM. COMPOS. 37:1223–1230, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics AGH University of Science and Technology Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30‐059 Krakow Poland

Funding

AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics-statute research

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1748-3182/2/1/P0110.1088/1748-3182/2/1/P01 ↗
2. Riefsnider K.L. · ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. · 1983 · 813 · 136
3. Hastings G.W. · J. Intel. Mater. Syst. Str. · 1993 · 4
4. 10.1126/science.276.5309.7510.1126/science.276.5309.75 ↗
5. Caplan A.I. · Ciba Found. Symp. · 1988 · 136 · 3
6. Albert S.F. · Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. · 1981 · 8 · 92310.1016/S0891-8422(23)00490-1 ↗
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/3/2/00610.1088/0964-1726/3/2/006 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/3/00710.1088/0964-1726/5/3/007 ↗
9. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10453210.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104532 ↗
10. 10.1243/09544100JAERO17210.1243/09544100JAERO172 ↗
11. Ghosh S.K. · 2009
12. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.02.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.02.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/0263-8223(96)00033-510.1016/0263-8223(96)00033-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00020-310.1016/S1359-835X(01)00020-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-835X(04)00166-610.1016/S1359-835X(04)00166-6 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/00510.1088/0964-1726/15/3/005 ↗
18. 10.1098/rsif.2006.019410.1098/rsif.2006.0194 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.013 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmat193410.1038/nmat1934 ↗
21. Hansen C.J. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 1
22. 10.1002/adma.20100256110.1002/adma.201002561 ↗