journal article·2006-06

Flow‐induced warpage of injection‐molded TLCP fiber‐reinforced polypropylene composites

W.S. DePolo, D.G. Baird

Polymer Composites· Volume 27· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The most common belief is that warpage in injection‐molded fiber‐reinforced thermoplastics is primarily attributed to residual thermal stresses associated with shrinkage and thermal contraction of the parts. Therefore, it is assumed that flow‐induced stresses generated during mold filling do not play a significant role. Injection‐molded plaques of polypropylene (PP) reinforced with pregenerated thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer (TLCP) microfibrils were generated in order to investigate the role of residual flow‐induced stresses relative to that of thermal stresses on the warpage. In an effort to relate the material parameters to warpage, the rheological behavior of these fiber‐filled systems was investigated. The shrinkage and the thermal expansion of the TLCP/PP composites, and hence, the thermally induced stresses decreased with an increase in fiber loading while the flow‐induced stresses increased. The increase in the flow‐induced stresses was attributed to increased relaxation times (this is not the only cause, but is a significant factor) with an increase in fiber loading. Therefore, it was found that in order to accurately predict the warpage of fiber‐reinforced thermoplastics, the flow‐induced residual stresses must be accounted for. It is expected that the results reported here can be extended to glass‐reinforced PP composites as well. POLYM. COMPOS., 27:239–248, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pen.76034180810.1002/pen.760341808 ↗
2. 10.1002/pen.1052610.1002/pen.10526 ↗
3. 10.1002/pen.1052710.1002/pen.10527 ↗
4. 10.1002/pen.1052510.1002/pen.10525 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0377-0257(98)00148-710.1016/S0377-0257(98)00148-7 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2001910.1002/pc.20019 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2002810.1002/pc.20028 ↗
8. 10.1002/pen.1101510.1002/pen.11015 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00045-310.1016/S0263-8223(00)00045-3 ↗
10. 10.1081/PPT-12002536610.1081/PPT-120025366 ↗
11. 10.1002/pen.76035040910.1002/pen.760350409 ↗
12. 10.1002/pen.1041910.1002/pen.10419 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.1058510.1002/pen.10585 ↗
14. R.Wimberger‐Friedl Ph.D. thesis Eindhoven University of Technology The Netherlands (1990).
15. 10.1002/pc.75016041110.1002/pc.750160411 ↗
16. Baird D.G. · J. Injection Molding Technol. · 2001 · 5 · 233
17. 10.3139/217.96008210.3139/217.960082 ↗
18. D.G.BairdandA.M.Sukhadia U.S. Patent 5 225 488 (1993).
19. 10.3139/217.92021810.3139/217.920218 ↗
20. 10.1002/app.1974.07018061410.1002/app.1974.070180614 ↗
21. Baird D.G. · 1998
22. M.Read Ph.D. thesis Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg VA (1986).
23. Bird R.B. · 1987