journal article·2005-10Open access

Bulk fatigue damage evolution in polyamide‐6 and in a polyamide‐6 nanocomposite

Simon C. Bellemare, J. Ivan Dickson, Martin N. Bureau, Johanne Denault

Polymer Composites· Volume 26· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract The mechanical response of a polyamide‐6 montmorillonite clay nanocomposite and of a polyamide‐6 was monitored during axial fatigue tests performed at R‐ratios of 0.1 and −1. For both materials, two transitions were usually observed in the evolution of all the stress‐strain‐time parameters studied after similar numbers of loading cycles, suggesting interrelationships between the mechanisms of molecular reorganization. Fatigue test monitoring indicated an initial decrease in the storage modulus and a subsequent trend for this modulus to increase, especially in polyamide‐6. During all tests, a partially recoverable strain was accumulated because of viscoelastic deformation. Nanoparticles reduced this strain in the initial cyclic straining regime but not in the last regime, probably because such particles cannot inhibit viscoelastic events constrained in a volume larger than their interaction volume within the matrix. Based on the accumulated volume variation measured, the nucleation and growth of microvoids can be expected to occur in the last cyclic straining regime. POLYM. COMPOS., 26:636–646, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Sherman L.M. · Plastics Technol. · 1999 · 45 · 52
2. 10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-710.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/0928-4931(95)00110-710.1016/0928-4931(95)00110-7 ↗
4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980711)69:2<355::AID-APP17>3.0.CO;2-V10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980711)69:2<355::AID-APP17>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
5. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990214)71:7<1133::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990214)71:7<1133::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
6. Bureau M.N. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Pap. · 2001 · 59 · 2125
7. R.A.KalgaonkarandJ.P.Jog SPE Conf. Polym. Nanocomposites 2001 Montreal September 17–19 Paper 20 (2001).
8. N.R.Krishna N.Bulakh andJ.P.Jog SPE Conf. Polym. Nanocomposites 2001 Montreal September 17–19 Paper 18 (2001).
9. Lee J.A. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Pap. · 2002 · 60 · 2230
10. 10.1163/15685540175325543110.1163/156855401753255431 ↗
11. 10.1002/pen.1108210.1002/pen.11082 ↗
12. 10.1002/1099-0488(20010301)39:5<484::AID-POLB1022>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/1099-0488(20010301)39:5<484::AID-POLB1022>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
13. 10.1002/polb.109610.1002/polb.1096 ↗
14. 10.1557/JMR.1993.118510.1557/JMR.1993.1185 ↗
15. 10.1002/polb.110810.1002/polb.1108 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00395-010.1016/S0032-3861(01)00395-0 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00468-710.1016/S0032-3861(00)00468-7 ↗
18. Carlson E. · Automotive Eng. · 1996 · 104 · 84
19. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19980930)36:13<2355::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19980930)36:13<2355::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
20. 10.1023/A:101322912868610.1023/A:1013229128686 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:100478952264210.1023/A:1004789522642 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.76031100510.1002/pen.760311005 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0113292310.1007/BF01132923 ↗
24. Hertzberg R.W. · 1980
25. 10.1007/BF0113335310.1007/BF01133353 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0238781010.1007/BF02387810 ↗
27. 10.1016/0010-4361(90)90239-S10.1016/0010-4361(90)90239-S ↗
28. 10.1002/pen.1067110.1002/pen.10671 ↗
29. 10.1023/A:101863453086910.1023/A:1018634530869 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2003610.1002/pc.20036 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0055475810.1007/BF00554758 ↗
32. 10.1002/app.1995.07058050410.1002/app.1995.070580504 ↗
33. Yamashita A. · Compos. Interfaces · 1999 · 6 · 24710.1163/156855499X00071 ↗
34. 10.1557/JMR.1993.118510.1557/JMR.1993.1185 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0055184710.1007/BF00551847 ↗
36. 10.1016/0032-3861(75)90212-810.1016/0032-3861(75)90212-8 ↗
37. S.C.Bellemare “Effect of Nanoparticles on the Fatigue Behavior of a Semicrystalline Polymer ” M.A.Sc. Thesis École Polytechnique de Montréal (2002).
38. 10.1016/0022-5096(58)90022-X10.1016/0022-5096(58)90022-X ↗
39. Bellemare S.C. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Pap. · 2002 · 60 · 2235
40. 10.1007/BF0114550610.1007/BF01145506 ↗
41. J.Remmerswaal 3rd Int. Conf. Low Cycle Fatigue and Elasto‐Plastic Behav. Mater. Berlin 37(1992).10.1007/978-94-011-2860-5_7 ↗
42. 10.1007/BF0239791610.1007/BF02397916 ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0054076410.1007/BF00540764 ↗
44. Doi M. · 1986
45. Ward I.M. · 1993
46. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19981115)36:15<2751::AID-POLB9>3.0.CO;2-610.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19981115)36:15<2751::AID-POLB9>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
47. W.Mizuno M.Kawagoe J.Qui andM.Morita Int. Conf. on Deform. Yield Fracture Polym. Cambridge UK April 7–10 431(1997).
48. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00324.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00324.x ↗
49. 10.1002/app.1987.07034010210.1002/app.1987.070340102 ↗
50. 10.1007/BFb001801810.1007/BFb0018018 ↗
51. 10.1002/pen.1063410.1002/pen.10634 ↗
52. 10.1007/BF0113335010.1007/BF01133350 ↗