journal article·2003-02

Morphology and compression‐after‐impact strength relationship in interleaved toughened composites

B. J. Derkowski, H.‐J. Sue

Polymer Composites· Volume 24· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Morphology and compression after impact (CAI) strength relationships in interleaved toughened high performance composites are investigated using a quantitative two‐dimensional image analysis approach. A group of six quasi‐isotropic carbon fiber‐epoxy composites with identical compositions, but having variations in CAI strengths, were analyzed to study how the interleaf particle size, particle size distribution, and location of particles in the interlaminar region affect the CAI strength values and the corresponding damage mechanisms. It is found that the CAI strength of interleaved‐toughened composites is significantly affected by the size and size distribution of toughener particles in the interlaminar regions of the composite. In general, high CAI strength composites exhibit more uniform particle size distribution throughout the interlaminar regions. Whereas, for low CAI strength composites, the interleaf particles tend to cluster together and have varied size distribution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00080-210.1016/S0266-3538(96)00080-2 ↗
2. E. N.Gilbert B. S.Hayes andJ. C.Seferis “Influence of preformed particle size distribution on the structure and properties of prepreg systems ” 31st International SAMPE Technical Conference Chicago IL USA 26–30 Oct.1999
3. Advanced Materials & Processes: Preparing for the New Millennium Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering 1999 pp.444–455.
4. Lee‐Sullivan P. · 1995 · 3
5. N.Odagiri et. al. “Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials having Resin Particle Inter‐Layer Zones ” U.S. Patent 5 028.478 (1991)—Toray.
6. J. E.Masters J. L.Courter andR. E.Evans “Impact Fracture and Failure Suppression Using Interleafed Composites ” International SAMPE Symposium April 7–10 1986 Las Vegas Nevada Volume #31.1986 pp.844–858.
7. G. L.DolanandJ. E.Masters “Characterization of Carbon/Bismaleimide Interleafed for Improved Resistance to Delamination and Impact ” 20th International SAMPE Technical Conference September 27–29 1988.
8. Masters J. E. · 1989
9. Matthews F. L. · 1987 · 96
10. N.SelaandO.Ishai “Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and Toughening of Laminated Composite Materials: A Review ”Composites Volume 20 Number 5 September1989.10.1016/0010-4361(89)90211-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(91)90054-S10.1016/0266-3538(91)90054-S ↗
12. The Role of Impact Damagen in Post‐Impact Compression Testing10.1016/0010-4361(90)90423-T ↗
13. I.Chou T.Inutake andK.Namba Correlation of Damage Resistance Under Low Velocity Impact and Mode II Delamination Resistance in CFRP Laminates Advanced Composite Materials (Netherlands) Vol. 8 167–176 1999.10.1163/156855199X00173 ↗
14. R. J.Day A. A.Wazzan andP. A.Lovell “A New Route to Rubber Toughened Carbon/Epoxy Composite ”Institute of Materials(UK) 599–608 1997.
15. 10.1016/0263-8223(93)90231-E10.1016/0263-8223(93)90231-E ↗
16. J.Bauer G.Guenther andR.Neumeier “Allowable Compression Strength for CFRP—Components of Fighter Aircraft Determined by CAI test.”1992. Messerschmitt‐Boelkow‐Blohm G.M.B.H. Munich. Report: MBB‐FE221‐S‐PUB‐0483.
17. Three‐dimensional characterization of Impact Damage in CFRP,
18. Kusaka T. · Nippon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, A · 63 · 2359
19. Experimental Study on Impact‐Induced Damage in CFRP Laminated Composites Using SAM and SEM Techniques,
20. “Debonding/Delamination of Composites ” Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development Neuilly‐sur‐Seine (France) Dec.1992.
21. 1991 · 6
22. Y. B.Shi Ph. D. Thesis Cambridge Univ. U.K. (1991).
23. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)90411-R10.1016/0010-4361(95)90411-R ↗
24. 10.2514/3.1274610.2514/3.12746 ↗
25. 10.1016/0263-8223(93)90020-Q10.1016/0263-8223(93)90020-Q ↗
26. 10.1016/0961-9526(95)00052-O10.1016/0961-9526(95)00052-O ↗
27. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.141-143.27710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.141-143.277 ↗
28. 10.1023/A:101855250608510.1023/A:1018552506085 ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0135220110.1007/BF01352201 ↗
30. Nohara T. · 1995
31. Lee S. M. · J. SAMPE · 1986 · 3 · 64
32. 10.1177/00219983980320120310.1177/002199839803201203 ↗
33. 10.1016/0010-4361(89)90211-510.1016/0010-4361(89)90211-5 ↗
34. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)91385-I10.1016/0010-4361(95)91385-I ↗
35. Private Communication Douglas Cairns Jan. '98.
36. Russ J. C. · 1996
37. Weibel E. R. · 1979