journal article·1991-06

Rheological behavior and fiber orientation in slit flow of fiber reinforced thermoplastics

A. T. Mutel, M. R. Kamal

Polymer Composites· Volume 12· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The flow behavior and fiber orientation in slit flow of a short fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite melt are investigated. A slit die with adjustable gap and interchangeable entrance geometries was designed and built. The slit die is fed by a single screw extruder. The bulk viscosity is calculated from the axial pressure profiles measured using three flush mounted pressure transducers. The effect of entrance geometry and gap dimensions on the fiber orientation and bulk flow behavior is specifically considered. A skin‐core composite fiber orientation is observed in the thickness direction. Fibers are oriented in the flow direction and parallel to the walls in the skin region irrespective of the entrance geometry. Different fiber orientation distributions in the core region can be realized by using different entrance geometries. However, the changes in the core fiber orientation are not fully reflected by the measured viscosities, due to highly oriented skin layer. Exit pressures obtained by extrapolation of linear pressure profiles are found to be all positive, but dependent on the die geometry and entrance conditions, even for the unfilled melts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. M.VincentandJ. F.Agassant “Interrelations Between Processing Structure and Processing of Polymeric Materials ” J. F. Seferis and P. S. Theocaris eds. p.241(1984).
2. 10.1177/00219983690030020410.1177/002199836900300204 ↗
3. 10.1002/pen.76020140310.1002/pen.760201403 ↗
4. M.Takano Monsanto/Washington University Assoc. Rep. No. HPC 70–116.
5. Mutel A. T. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1987 · 33 · 732
6. 10.1007/BF0141046410.1007/BF01410464 ↗
7. L. A.Goettler Second NRCC‐IMRI Mini Symposium “Composites 82 ” Montreal Nov. 30 1982.
8. Goettler L. A. · Modern Plastics · 1970 · 47 · 140
9. 10.1002/pen.76018021210.1002/pen.760180212 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0133259410.1007/BF01332594 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-1-4684-6575-410.1007/978-1-4684-6575-4 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0133237010.1007/BF01332370 ↗
13. Rauwendal C. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1984 · 30
14. 10.1016/0032-3861(76)90107-510.1016/0032-3861(76)90107-5 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.76026030710.1002/pen.760260307 ↗
16. A. T.Mutel PhD dissertation McGill University (1989).
17. Goldsmith H. L. · 1967 · 212
18. 10.1122/1.54921210.1122/1.549212 ↗
19. 10.1017/S002211207500145010.1017/S0022112075001450 ↗
20. 10.1122/1.54935410.1122/1.549354 ↗
21. 10.1016/0377-0257(87)87011-810.1016/0377-0257(87)87011-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/0377-0257(80)80001-210.1016/0377-0257(80)80001-2 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0197945710.1007/BF01979457 ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0133236910.1007/BF01332369 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.1971.07015102310.1002/app.1971.070151023 ↗
26. Read M. D. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1985 · 31 · 657
27. 10.1678/rheology1973.3.2_6410.1678/rheology1973.3.2_64 ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0135795210.1007/BF01357952 ↗
29. Yarlykov B. · Inter. Polym. Sci. Technol. · 1977 · 4 · T/7
30. 10.1002/pen.76020140410.1002/pen.760201404 ↗
31. Han C. D. · Polym. Eng. Rev. · 1981 · 1 · 363
32. 10.1122/1.54883210.1122/1.548832 ↗