Prediction of fiber orientation in the thickness plane during flow molding of short fiber composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fiber orientations caused by the flow in the thickness plane during injection molding of short fiber reinforced polymer composites has been simulated. The Lagrangian scheme was employed for the finite element analysis. Flow fields were solved by using a penalty method with Uzawa's scheme and orientation fields were also solved by using the second order orientation tensor. A generalized Newtonian fluid whose rheological behavior is independent of fiber orientation was assumed. Automatic mesh generation using an elliptic grid generator was developed for quadrilateral elements. Mold filling and orientation analyses were performed for a cavity of rectangular cross section. To determine the orientation state in other cross‐sectional geometries, numerical analyses were also performed for two different typical cross sections. As the result, orientation of short fibers in the flow field was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. According to the state of short fiber orientation in the thickness plane, the orientation field can be classified into three regions in the flow direction and three layers in the thickness direction. Orientation of short fibers was mainly influenced by elongational and shear flows. It was observed that critical values are present for upper limits of orientation. Effects of initial orientation at the inlet on the orientation field were examined.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1098/rspa.1922.007810.1098/rspa.1922.0078 ↗
2. 10.1177/00219983830170040410.1177/002199838301700404 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.75011010810.1002/pc.750110108 ↗
4. 10.1177/07316844840030020110.1177/073168448400300201 ↗
5. 10.1122/1.54994510.1122/1.549945 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.75011030510.1002/pc.750110305 ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.76020140310.1002/pen.760201403 ↗
8. 10.1016/0266-3538(86)90009-610.1016/0266-3538(86)90009-6 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.75007011010.1002/pc.750070110 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.75012030210.1002/pc.750120302 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.75006020410.1002/pc.750060204 ↗
12. 10.1122/1.55004710.1122/1.550047 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.76030160510.1002/pen.760301605 ↗
14. 10.1177/00219983860200060310.1177/002199838602000603 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.76026070210.1002/pen.760260702 ↗
16. 10.1002/aic.69034030710.1002/aic.690340307 ↗
17. 10.1002/pen.76026030310.1002/pen.760260303 ↗
18. 10.1002/aic.69033071210.1002/aic.690330712 ↗
19. 10.1002/pen.76031111110.1002/pen.760311111 ↗
20. 10.1002/app.1974.07018061410.1002/app.1974.070180614 ↗
21. 10.1016/0032-3861(80)90189-510.1016/0032-3861(80)90189-5 ↗
22. 10.1002/aic.69033071110.1002/aic.690330711 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.75007020310.1002/pc.750070203 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.75013040910.1002/pc.750130409 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.75013041010.1002/pc.750130410 ↗
26. C. A.HieberandH.Lobo C‐Flow User's Guide: Material Data Bank Advanced CAE Tech. (1985).
27. Fortin M. · 1983
28. 10.1002/fld.165004050510.1002/fld.1650040505 ↗
29. 10.1002/fld.165009010810.1002/fld.1650090108 ↗
30. 10.1122/1.55013310.1122/1.550133 ↗
31. Zienkiewicz O. C. · 1975
32. 10.1115/1.324260410.1115/1.3242604 ↗
33. 10.1016/0021-9991(74)90114-410.1016/0021-9991(74)90114-4 ↗
34. 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90165-710.1016/0021-9991(79)90165-7 ↗
35. 10.1002/nme.162028030410.1002/nme.1620280304 ↗