Comparing the In‐Plane Shear Behavior of Glass Fiber‐Reinforced and Carbon Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Laminates With the Same Epoxy Matrix System in ±45° Tensile Tests
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The in‐plane shear behavior of glass fiber‐reinforced and carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy (GF‐ and CF‐epoxy) laminates manufactured with the same matrix system is investigated using quasi‐static ±45° tensile tests. Damage initiation and progression is monitored by optical crack detection for the translucent GF‐epoxy and by acoustic emission (AE) analysis for both materials. The study evaluates different criteria for determining the shear stress, , at failure to obtain ply level rather than laminate level strength values and examines the influence of the transverse stress component, , on measured at failure using classical laminate theory. In GF‐epoxy, optically observed crack initiation or first‐ply‐failure (FPF) coincides with a sharp increase in AE activity, enabling an AE‐based FPF criterion that more accurately represents ply strength than values from ASTM D3518. Besides the AE‐based detection, the ASTM D3039 transition point method provides the most reliable FPF estimates. GF‐epoxy exhibits lower at failure than CF‐epoxy, consistent with the higher resulting contribution arising from lower orthotropy. For both laminates, the shear modulus of elasticity depends on the selected shear angle, , range due to a gradual decrease in the – slope. In GF‐epoxy, maximum AE signal amplitude rate correlates well with optically measured crack density.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Science and Testing of Polymers, Technical University of Leoben Leoben Austria
Designing Plastics and Composite Materials, Technical University of Leoben Leoben Austria
Retired From Laboratory for Mechanical Systems Engineering, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology Dübendorf Switzerland
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure “Development of Fibre‐Reinforced Plastics components–Analysis ”(2006).
2. Knops M. · 2008
3. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials With Unsupported Gage Section by Shear Loading ”West Conshohocken.
4. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials Using a Combined Loading Compression (CLC) Test Fixture ”West Conshohocken.
5. Deutsches Institut Für Normung “Fibre‐Reinforced Plastic Composites ‐ Determination of Compressive Properties in the In‐Plane Direction ”Berlin.
6. Deutsches Institut Für Normung “Plastics–Determination of Tensile Properties: Part 5: Test Conditions for Unidirectional Fibre‐Reinforced Plastic Composites ”Berlin.
7. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials ”West Conshohocken.
8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10032-310.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10032-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/0010‐4361(86)90729‐910.1016/0010‐4361(86)90729‐9 ↗
10. Paris F. · 2022
11. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for In‐Plane Shear Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by the Rail Shear Method ”West Cconshohocken.
12. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for Shear Properties of Composite Materials by V‐Notched Rail Shear Method ”West Conshohocken.
13. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for Shear Properties of Composite Materials by the V‐Notched Beam Method ”West Conshohocken.
14. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for In‐Plane Shear Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by Tensile Test of a ±45° Laminate ”West Conshohocken.
15. Deutsches Institut Für Normung “Aerospace Series–Fibre Reinforced Plastics–Test Method–Determination of In‐Plane Shear Properties (±45° Tensile Test) ”Berlin.
16. Deutsches Institut für Normung “Fibre‐Reinforced Plastic Composites–Determination of the In‐Plane Shear Stress/Shear Strain Response Including the In‐Plane Shear Modulus and Strength by ±45° Tension Test Method ”Berlin.
17. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for Inplane Shear Properties of Hoop Wound Polymer Matrix Composite Cylinders ”West Conschohocken.
18. Deutsches Institut für Normung “Fibre‐Reinforced Plastic Composites–Shear Test Method Using a Shear Frame for the Determination of the In‐Plane Shear Stress/Shear Strain Response and Shear Modulus ”Berlin.
19. American Society for Testing and Materials “Withdrawal of D3846‐08(2015) Standard Test Method for In‐Plane Shear Strength of Reinforced Plastics ”Wecst Conshohocken.
20. American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Test Method for In‐Plane Shear Strength of Reinforced Plastics ”West Conshohocken.
21. 10.1177/00405175690390040710.1177/004051756903900407 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0232632010.1007/BF02326320 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0232414610.1007/BF02324146 ↗
24. 10.2514/6.1978-50810.2514/6.1978-508 ↗
25. 10.1177/00219983990330230110.1177/002199839903302301 ↗
26. 10.1515/secm‐2021‐002210.1515/secm‐2021‐0022 ↗
27. 10.1016/0010‐4361(90)90422‐S10.1016/0010‐4361(90)90422‐S ↗
28. 10.1016/0010‐4361(85)90605‐610.1016/0010‐4361(85)90605‐6 ↗
29. 10.1016/0010‐4361(77)90011‐810.1016/0010‐4361(77)90011‐8 ↗
30. 10.1016/0010‐4361(78)90519‐010.1016/0010‐4361(78)90519‐0 ↗
31. 10.1016/0010‐4361(79)90025‐910.1016/0010‐4361(79)90025‐9 ↗
32. 10.1520/JTE11475J10.1520/JTE11475J ↗
33. 10.1177/00219983700040040910.1177/002199837000400409 ↗
34. Kellas S. · 1991
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.023 ↗
36. S.KellasandJ.Morton “Strength Scaling in Fiber Composites: NASA‐CR‐4335 ”(1990) NASA‐CR‐4335 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910002791.
37. 10.1520/STP24735S10.1520/STP24735S ↗
38. M.Drvoderic “Probeneinflüsse Bei Der Mechanischen Prüfung Von Composites Montanuniversitaet Leoben ”(2018) https://pure.unileoben.ac.at/de/publications/probeneinfl%C3%BCsse‐bei‐der‐mechanischen‐pr%C3%BCfung‐von‐composites.
39. Deutsches Institut Für Normung “Metallic Materials–Calibration and Verification of Static Uniaxial Testing Machines: Part 1: Tension/Compression Testing Machines–Calibration and Verification of the Force‐Measuring System ”Berlin.
40. 10.1016/j.softx.2022.10119810.1016/j.softx.2022.101198 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.softx.2021.10083210.1016/j.softx.2021.100832 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.11100910.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111009 ↗
43. Greenhalgh E. S. · 2009 · 164
44. 10.1002/pc.75008050910.1002/pc.750080509 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.004 ↗