journal article·2026-07-10

Study on Translaminar Fracture Toughness of Plain‐Woven Carbon/Kevlar Hybrid Composites

Kuishang Bu, Wenqin Han, Bin Hu

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, the translaminar fracture toughness of plain‐woven carbon/Kevlar hybrid composite laminates with different hybridization methods (intralaminar, interlaminar, inter/intralaminar) and ply orientations (0° only, 0° combined with 45°) was investigated. Tests were performed using the compact tension configuration. Digital image correlation was used to characterize the evolution of the surface strain field, and acoustic emission monitoring was employed to track the damage evolution process. The results showed that the intralaminar hybridization mode exhibited a superior toughening effect compared with the interlaminar one. Specifically, the carbon–Kevlar intralaminar hybrid (CK) specimens show a 7% increase in the critical stress intensity factor ( K Ic ) relative to the carbon fiber composites, whereas the carbon/Kevlar interlaminar hybrid (C/K) specimen demonstrates no significant improvement in K Ic . With the introduction of 45° ply orientation, a marked enhancement in K Ic is observed for all specimens. Furthermore, experimental results reveal that specimens containing Kevlar fibers exhibit a reduced crack propagation length, which is attributed to the high ductility of Kevlar fibers, enabling effective suppression of unstable crack growth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology Changzhou China

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10469210.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104692 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10852910.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108529 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10750210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107502 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1510240310.3390/polym15102403 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.coco.2023.10153210.1016/j.coco.2023.101532 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.007 ↗
8. 10.1080/14658011.2019.159179510.1080/14658011.2019.1591795 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.016 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11369510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113695 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(97)00224‐810.1016/S0266‐3538(97)00224‐8 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.02610.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11011710.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110117 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.02.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2017.02.029 ↗
16. 10.4018/979‐8‐3693‐3993‐0.ch00310.4018/979‐8‐3693‐3993‐0.ch003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11372610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113726 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11629910.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116299 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12807210.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.128072 ↗
20. 10.1007/s13726‐023‐01217‐110.1007/s13726‐023‐01217‐1 ↗
21. 10.1515/mt‐2024‐023210.1515/mt‐2024‐0232 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.031 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.10.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2015.10.020 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.014 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.022 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.046 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.023 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.009 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10698710.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106987 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10930710.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109307 ↗
32. 10.1177/0021998324123585310.1177/00219983241235853 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.08.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.08.012 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11791110.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117911 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10708310.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107083 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10899310.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108993 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.10381210.1016/j.tafmec.2023.103812 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11429910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114299 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.019 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11648110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116481 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.10152610.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101526 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11296410.1016/j.matdes.2024.112964 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11077410.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110774 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10803910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108039 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.01410.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.014 ↗
46. 10.1002/pc.2950910.1002/pc.29509 ↗
47. 10.1080/01694243.2024.234369110.1080/01694243.2024.2343691 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10583310.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105833 ↗